This series explores bad arguments in the Canadian public sphere. The aim of the series is to take a closer look at the soft-serve reasoning employed by public leaders in order to see how they are unconvincing and even harmful to open discourse.
This series explores bad arguments in the Canadian public sphere. The aim of the series is to take a closer look at the soft-serve reasoning employed by public leaders in order to see how they are unconvincing and even harmful to open discourse.
