
<rss 
	version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<atom:link href="https://thenarwhal.ca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<title>The Narwhal | News on Climate Change, Environmental Issues in Canada</title>
	<link>https://thenarwhal.ca</link>
  <description>The Narwhal’s team of investigative journalists dives deep to tell stories about the natural world in Canada you can’t find anywhere else.</description>
  <language>en-US</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2026 The Narwhal News Society</copyright>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 05:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	    <item>
      <title>Digging for The Truth on Site C Dam Job Numbers</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/digging-truth-site-c-dam-job-numbers/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/2017/11/16/digging-truth-site-c-dam-job-numbers/</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:53:33 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[Site C jobs are often cited as a main reason to proceed with the $9 billion dam on B.C.’s Peace River. But how many jobs would Site C actually create? Are there really 2,375 people currently employed on the project, as widely reported this month? DeSmog Canada dove into Site C jobs numbers. We found dubious...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="826" height="620" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Site-C-Dam.jpg" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Site-C-Dam.jpg 826w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Site-C-Dam-760x570.jpg 760w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Site-C-Dam-450x338.jpg 450w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Site-C-Dam-20x15.jpg 20w" sizes="(max-width: 826px) 100vw, 826px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption></figure> <p>Site C jobs are often cited as a main reason to proceed with the $9 billion dam on B.C.&rsquo;s Peace River. But how many jobs would Site C actually create? Are there really 2,375 people currently employed on the project, as widely reported this month?</p>
<p>DeSmog Canada dove&nbsp;into Site C jobs numbers. We found dubious claims, political spin, and far too much secrecy.</p>
<p><!--break--></p>
<ul>
<li>
<ul>
<li>Number of direct construction jobs BC Hydro said Site C would create in March 1991: <strong>2,182&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong><a href="#_ftn1">[1]</a></li>
<li>Number of Site C direct construction jobs promised by Premier Gordon Campbell in April 2010: <strong>7,650&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong><a href="#_ftn2">[2]</a></li>
<li>Number of Site C direct construction jobs promised by Premier Christy Clark in December 2014: <strong>10,000&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong><a href="#_ftn3">[3]</a></li>
<li>Workforce at peak employment at the W.A.C. Bennett dam, B.C.&rsquo;s largest dam, in the 1960s:&nbsp; <strong>3,500&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong><a href="#_ftn4">[4]</a></li>
<li>Workforce at peak employment at the Peace Canyon Dam in the 1970s: <strong>1,100&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong><a href="#_ftn5">[5]</a></li>
<li>Number of pages redacted from the B.C. Liberal government&rsquo;s response to a 2016 Freedom of Information request asking for documents related to Site C&rsquo;s job creation figures: <strong>880&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#_ftn6"><strong>[6]</strong></a></strong></li>
<li>Time it took to receive the request: <strong>11.5 months</strong></li>
<li>Number of pages with <a>redactions</a>&nbsp;in BC Hydro&rsquo;s 692-page response to a 2017 Freedom of Information request asking for daily worker headcounts at Site C: <strong>692</strong><a href="#_ftn7">[7]</a></li>
<li>Date BC Hydro said it did not have daily and weekly headcounts for Site C workers on the project site or staying at the workers&rsquo; lodge: <strong>October 12, 2017&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong><a href="#_ftn8">[8]</a></li>
<li>Number of people BC Hydro&rsquo;s Site C main website page says were employed on the project in September 2017: <strong>2,375&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#_ftn9"><strong>[9]</strong></a></strong></li>
<li>Number of Full Time Employees (FTEs) among them: <strong>unknown</strong></li>
<li>Minimum number of days a contract worker must be employed to be included in BC Hydro&rsquo;s monthly Site C jobs tally: <strong>unknown</strong></li>
<li>Approximate number of direct construction contract workers included in the September 2017 Site C workers tally: <strong>1,164&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#_ftn10"><strong>[10]</strong></a></strong></li>
<li>Approximate number of other contract workers included in the September 2017 Site C workers tally:<strong> 750&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#_ftn11"><strong>[11]</strong></a></strong></li>
<li>Number of engineers and project team staff, including at BC Hydro&rsquo;s head office in Vancouver, included in the September 2017 Site C workers tally: <strong>461&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#_ftn12"><strong>[12]</strong></a></strong></li>
<li>Number of workers laid off at the Site C construction site in August 2017: <strong>120&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong><a href="#_ftn13">[13]</a></li>
<li>Number of workers laid off at the Site C construction site in September 2017: approximately <strong>200&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong><a href="#_ftn14">[14]</a></li>
<li>Number of workers laid off over Thanksgiving weekend, 2017: approximately <strong>60</strong><a href="#_ftn15">[&nbsp; 15]</a></li>
<li>Number of workers laid off in early November 2017: approximately <strong>30&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#_ftn16"><strong>[16]</strong></a></strong></li>
<li>Mentions of the layoffs on BC Hydro&rsquo;s website:<strong> 0 </strong></li>
<li>Current number of Site C workers according to Liberal MLA Mike Bernier: <strong>2,400&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="#_ftn17"><strong>[17]</strong></a></strong></li>
<li>Cost of Site C in 2010: <strong>$6.6 billion</strong></li>
<li>Cost of Site C in 2012: <strong>$7.9 billion</strong></li>
<li>Cost of Site C in December 2014: <strong>$8.8 billion</strong></li>
<li>Cost of Site C in November 2017: <strong>potentially more than</strong> <strong>$10 billion&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong><a href="#_ftn18">[18]</a></li>
<li>Date BC Hydro filed a quarterly report with the B.C. Utilities Commission saying Site C was on budget and on track to meet its 2024 completion date: <strong>September 29, 2017&nbsp;&nbsp;</strong><a href="#_ftn19">[19]</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p></p>
<ul>
<li>Date the BCUC released a report saying it is not persuaded Site C will be finished on time and that the project is over-budget with completion costs that could exceed $10 billion: <strong>November 1, 2017</strong></li>
<li>Date the B.C. government will make a final decision about Site C: <strong>before</strong> <strong>December 31, 2017</strong></li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<p>Digging for The Truth on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SiteC?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener">#SiteC</a> Dam Job Numbers <a href="https://t.co/YKAhAwWW7I">https://t.co/YKAhAwWW7I</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/bcpoli?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener">#bcpoli</a></p>
<p>&mdash; DeSmog Canada (@DeSmogCanada) <a href="https://twitter.com/DeSmogCanada/status/931221214470725632?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener">November 16, 2017</a></p></blockquote>
<p></p>

<p><a href="#_ftnref1">[1]</a> B.C. Hydro and Power Authority, &ldquo;Peace Site C Summary Status Report,&rdquo; March 1991. Calculated from information on page 6-31.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref2">[2]</a> https://archive.news.gov.bc.ca/releases/news_releases_2009-2013/2010PREM0083-000436.htm</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref3">[3]</a> https://news.gov.bc.ca/stories/site-c-to-provide-more-than-100-years-of-affordable-reliable-clean-power</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref4">[4]</a> Meg Stanley for the BC Hydro Power Pioneers. <em>Voices from Two Rivers: Harnessing the Power of the Peace and Columbia</em>. Vancouver: Douglas &amp; McIntyre, 2010, page 80.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref5">[5]</a> Ibid.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref6">[6]</a> The August 2016 FOI request asked for all e-mails and documents exchanged between the ministry and BC Hydro regarding Site C&rsquo;s job creation figures. It also asked for all e-mails, attachments and documents exchanged between the ministry and BC Hydro regarding Site C and project planning, including Site C&rsquo;s most recent budget and timeline.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref7">[7]</a> The FOI request asked for daily or weekly headcounts for Site C workers in 2017, as per the work site&rsquo;s Emergency Response Plan, and for weekly headcounts of workers staying overnight at the Site C workers&rsquo; accommodation facility in 2017.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref8">[8]</a> BC Hydro&rsquo;s FOI response did not contain daily or weekly headcounts for on-site workers. Nor did it contain weekly headcounts of workers staying overnight at the Site C workers&rsquo; accommodation facility in 2017. DeSmog Canada subsequently sent an email to BC Hydro asking again for that information to be released and was told that BC Hydro &ldquo;does not have daily or weekly headcounts for workers on-site or at the workers&rsquo; accommodations.&rdquo;</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref9">[9]</a> Accessed November 7, 2017.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref10">[10]</a> <a href="https://www.sitecproject.com/sites/default/files/Site-C-Employment-Statistics-August-2017.pdf" rel="noopener">https://www.sitecproject.com/sites/default/files/Site-C-Employment-Statistics-August-2017.pdf</a>. For this calculation, direct construction jobs were considered to be the following categories: carpenters and scaffolders; cement masons, construction and environmental inspector; construction managers/supervisors, crane operators, electricians, heavy equipment operators, ironworkers, labourers, mechanics, millwrights, &ldquo;others &mdash; construction trades&rdquo;, pipefitters and plumbers, security guards, truck drivers, underground mining, and; welders.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref11">[11]</a> Ibid. Jobs included in the calculation were the following categories: biologists and laboratory; engineers; foresters; health care workers; housing staff; kitchen staff; &ldquo;professional and office managers&rdquo;; &ldquo;professionals, technicians and office staff&rdquo;; &ldquo;social science,&rdquo; and; surveyors.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref12">[12]</a> Ibid. In September 2017 BC Hydro reported 461 people employed as engineers and on BC Hydro&rsquo;s Site C project team. The engineers included in this figure are in addition to the approximate 160 engineers included in BC Hydro&rsquo;s job category of &ldquo;construction and non-construction contractors.&rdquo;</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref13">[13]</a> Email from Amber Harding, communications manager for the Peace River Hydro Partners, August 9, 2017.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref14">[14]</a> https://globalnews.ca/news/3771186/200-workers-laid-off-from-site-c-dam-project-reasons-unclear/</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref15">[15]</a> https://www.biv.com/article/2017/10/sixty-workers-laid-site-c/</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref16">[16]</a> November 10 email from Megan Adams, Communications Manager for the Peace River Hydro Partners.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref17">[17]</a> Tweeted by Bernier on November 9, 2017.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref18">[18]</a> British Columbia Utilities Commission Inquiry Respecting Site C, &ldquo;Executive Summary of the Final Report to the Government of British Columbia,&rdquo; November 1, 2017.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref19">[19]</a> <a href="https://www.sitecproject.com/sites/default/files/quarterly-progess-report-no8-f2018-q1-april-june.pdf" rel="noopener">https://www.sitecproject.com/sites/default/files/quarterly-progess-report-no8-f2018-q1-april-june.pdf</a>. See page 3.</p>
<p><em>Image: Little&nbsp;visible work activity in this November 5, 2017 photo of the Site C dam construction site. Photo: Supplied by Arlene Boon</em></p>

<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Cox]]></dc:creator>
			<category domain="post_cat"><![CDATA[Investigation]]></category>			<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Center Second]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[In-Depth]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[jobs]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Site C]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Site C dam]]></category>			<media:content url="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Site-C-Dam-760x570.jpg" fileSize="4096" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="760" height="570"><media:credit></media:credit></media:content><media:thumbnail url="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Site-C-Dam-760x570.jpg" width="760" height="570" />    </item>
	</channel>
</rss>