
<rss 
	version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Narwhal | News on Climate Change, Environmental Issues in Canada</title>
	<link>https://thenarwhal.ca</link>
  <description><![CDATA[Deep Dives, Cold Facts, &#38; Pointed Commentary]]></description>
  <language>en-US</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2026 The Narwhal News Society</copyright>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 03:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	    <item>
      <title>It&#8217;s Time to Put the Spotlight on Government Secrecy</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/it-s-time-put-spotlight-government-secrecy/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/2014/09/26/it-s-time-put-spotlight-government-secrecy/</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:25:17 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[Partisans may not believe it, but Canada&#8217;s &#8220;culture of secrecy&#8221; existed long before Stephen Harper moved into the prime minister&#8217;s office. And it&#8217;ll be around long after he moves out, unless Canadians do more than just cast their ballots in the next election. That&#8217;s why four groups concerned about freedom of information, one of which...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="480" height="480" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CDNFOI-ENGLISH1.jpg" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CDNFOI-ENGLISH1.jpg 480w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CDNFOI-ENGLISH1-160x160.jpg 160w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CDNFOI-ENGLISH1-470x470.jpg 470w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CDNFOI-ENGLISH1-450x450.jpg 450w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CDNFOI-ENGLISH1-20x20.jpg 20w" sizes="(max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption><hr></figure><p>Partisans may not believe it, but Canada&rsquo;s &ldquo;culture of secrecy&rdquo; existed long before Stephen Harper moved into the prime minister&rsquo;s office. And it&rsquo;ll be around long after he moves out, unless Canadians do more than just cast their ballots in the next election.<p>That&rsquo;s why four groups concerned about freedom of information, one of which I&rsquo;m part of, are launching a campaign encouraging Canadians to take a small but vital step on social media that would raise more awareness of just how much is being hidden from us: spotlighting examples of government secrecy with the hashtag #cdnfoi.</p><p>Such secrecy has its roots in our political system, which has a tradition of strict party discipline. Because of that discipline, decisions made by the government behind closed doors &ndash; in cabinet meetings, for example &ndash; are rarely defeated in the House of Commons, making secret forums the principle arbiters of public policy.</p><p>To be sure, the Harper administration has done more than its share to cultivate a backroom state, frustrating access to government records and officials, as well as failing to fix our broken freedom of information system. But Canadian society is an especially fertile ground for the growth of policies that violate our right to know.</p><p>In part, that&rsquo;s because our country doesn&rsquo;t have any groups that exclusively and routinely advocate for greater freedom of information at a national level. Probably the closest we have to that is the small <a href="https://fipa.bc.ca" rel="noopener">BC Freedom of Information and Privacy Association</a>.</p><p><!--break--></p><p>But, as its name implies, the association&rsquo;s two staff members toil on information <em>and</em> privacy issues in British Columbia <em>and</em> the rest of Canada from a tiny office above a <a href="http://kingqueenspa.com" rel="noopener">beauty salon and spa</a> in Vancouver.</p><p>Meanwhile, other organizations that care about our right to know have even more multiplicitous mandates. For example, Ottawa&rsquo;s <a href="http://democracywatch.ca" rel="noopener">DemocracyWatch</a> stands on guard for democratic reform and corporate responsibility, as well as freedom of information. Meanwhile, Halifax&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.law-democracy.org/live/" rel="noopener">Centre for Law and Democracy</a> also deals with other human rights issues abroad.</p><p>By comparison, the United States has three umbrella organizations that exclusively safeguard Americans&rsquo; right to know.</p><p>They include: <a href="http://www.openthegovernment.org" rel="noopener">OpenTheGovernment.org</a>, representing 94 groups; the <a href="http://www.nfoic.org" rel="noopener">National Freedom of Information Coalition</a>, representing 30 dues-paying groups; and the <a href="http://sunshineingovernment.org" rel="noopener">Sunshine in Government Initiative</a>, representing nine groups.</p><p>Such umbrella organizations have always been few and far between in Canada.</p><p>In the seventies, a coalition called ACCESS: a Canadian Committee for the Right to Public Information was established to lobby for greater freedom of information.</p><p>Reports from the Globe and Mail back then described the committee as having the backing of groups such as the Canadian Manufacturers&rsquo; Association, the Canadian Labour Congress and the Canadian Daily Newspapers Association.</p><p>But long-time right to know researcher <a href="http://www.kenrubin.ca" rel="noopener">Ken Rubin</a> stated in an email that ACCESS, which played a key role in the creation of Canada&rsquo;s current freedom of information law, was actually &ldquo;primarily a group of diverse individuals&rdquo; that included academics, activists and lawyers and had some &ldquo;paper&rdquo; affiliations with other organizations.</p><p>Despite that key role, by the eighties the committee had folded. According to Rubin, during the same decade, a &ldquo;loose coalition&rdquo; came together under the auspices of the Canadian Federation of Civil Liberties and Human Rights Associations to &ldquo;monitor and improve&rdquo; freedom of information. That coalition also &ldquo;went by the wayside&rdquo; once the federation &ldquo;faded away.&rdquo;</p><p>Then, in January 2000, investigative reporter <a href="http://www.thestar.com/authors.cribb_robert.html" rel="noopener">Robert Cribb announced</a> the formation of <a href="http://www.caj.ca/open-government-canada-ogc/" rel="noopener">Open Government Canada</a> &ndash; a &ldquo;national forum for FOI networking, education and advocacy pushing for legislative changes that grant greater access to public information.&ldquo;</p><p>More than <a href="http://www.caj.ca/open-government-canada-is-born/" rel="noopener">25 groups were represented at its founding conference</a> in March of that year. However, in an email, Cribb stated the coalition &ldquo;died a regretful death.&rdquo;</p><p>The reason: &ldquo;It proved to be impossible to lure financial support for such an endeavour &ndash; part of the perplexing lack of concern, engagement or righteous indignation in Canada around issues such as freedom of information and the public's right to know.&rdquo;</p><p>Those concerns aside, in 2011, <a href="http://democracywatch.ca" rel="noopener">DemocracyWatch</a> launched the Open Government Coalition. So far, the <a href="http://democracywatch.ca/open-government-coalition/" rel="noopener">coalition</a> is made up of three groups &ndash; not counting DemocracyWatch and an affiliated charity. Although founder Duff Conacher stated in an email he plans to expand it this fall.</p><p>In the meantime, the <a href="http://www.ndp.ca/news/defending-canadians-right-to-know" rel="noopener">New Democrats</a> and the <a href="http://www.liberal.ca/newsroom/news-release/justin-trudeau-introduce-transparency-act-house-commons/" rel="noopener">Liberals</a> have proposed laws and policies that would open up government. They should be applauded for doing so. And, if the past is a predictor of the future, they may even act on some of those proposals if they win power &ndash; just as the Conservatives did.</p><p>But eventually the expediency of secrecy seems to seduce every government, regardless of its political stripe. Which means a New Democrat or Liberal administration will likely become just as tight with information as the Conservatives &ndash; albeit, perhaps, with more of a velvet glove covering that clenched, iron fist.</p><p>Don&rsquo;t believe me? Well, look no further than the United States where Democrat <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment" rel="noopener">president Barack Obama swept into office promising</a> an &ldquo;unprecedented level of openness in Government.&rdquo;</p><p>Five years later, an <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/us-cites-security-more-censor-deny-records" rel="noopener">Associated Press analysis</a> found that in 2013 his administration &ldquo;more often than ever censored government files or outright denied access to them last year under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.&rdquo;</p><p>More recently, the agency also listed &ldquo;<a href="http://blog.ap.org/2014/09/19/8-ways-the-obama-administration-is-blocking-information/" rel="noopener">eight ways the Obama administration is blocking information</a>.&rdquo;</p><p>Meanwhile, for his part New York Times reporter James Risen has called <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/17/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-wheres-the-justice-at-justice.html?_r=0" rel="noopener">Obama &ldquo;the greatest enemy of press freedom in a generation</a>.&rdquo;</p><p>Just as neither the right nor the left has a monopoly on the truth, neither has a monopoly on secrecy.</p><p>As a result, it&rsquo;s vital for Canadians to start paying better attention to our information rights so we can better safeguard them.</p><p>That&rsquo;s why the BC Freedom of Information and Privacy Association, the <a href="http://www.caj.ca" rel="noopener">Canadian Association of Journalists</a>, <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca">DeSmog Canada</a> and <a href="http://www.integritybc.ca" rel="noopener">IntegrityBC</a>, are now encouraging Canadians to tweet about threats to their right to know using the hashtag #cdnfoi.</p><p>Those threats include everything from backroom government meetings and frustrated freedom of information requests to inaccessible officials and nonexistent public records, whether they are at the federal, provincial or local level.</p><p>At present, the use of that hashtag isn&rsquo;t widespread, making it more difficult for Canadians to know about such threats.</p><p>So, by just tagging stories about government secrecy with #cdnfoi, you can help your fellow citizens know about what they aren&rsquo;t being allowed to know.</p><p>And you can encourage others to take up the fight by sharing these graphics promoting #cdnfoi &ndash; helping change Canada&rsquo;s culture of secrecy in the process.</p><p><em>Image Credit: <a href="http://billyjohnnybrown.com/" rel="noopener">Will Brown</a></em></p></p>
<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Holman]]></dc:creator>
			<category domain="post_cat"><![CDATA[In-Depth]]></category>			<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[ACCESS]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[access to information]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[ATIP]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[BC Freedom of Information and Privacy Association]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Canada]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Canadian Association of Journalists]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[cdnfoi]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Centre for law and Democracy]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[DemocracyWatch]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[desmog canada]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[foia]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Freedom of Information]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Government]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[In-Depth]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[IntegrityBC]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Ken Rubin]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[National Freedom of Information Coalition]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[obama]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[OpenTheGovermnent.org]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[privacy]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Right Second]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Sean Holman]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[security]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Sunshine in Government Initiative]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>    </item>
	</channel>
</rss>