
<rss 
	version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Narwhal | News on Climate Change, Environmental Issues in Canada</title>
	<link>https://thenarwhal.ca</link>
  <description><![CDATA[Deep Dives, Cold Facts, &#38; Pointed Commentary]]></description>
  <language>en-US</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2026 The Narwhal News Society</copyright>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 11:38:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	    <item>
      <title>Is the Northern Gateway pipeline dead? Minister James Moore offers hints on government position</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/northern-gateway-pipeline-minister-james-moore-offers-hints-government-position-0/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/2013/06/01/northern-gateway-pipeline-minister-james-moore-offers-hints-government-position-0/</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 00:20:42 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[This is a guest post by Heather Libby. Earlier today, British Columbia Environment Minister Terry Lake gave notice that the provincial government officially objects to Enbridge&#8217;s application for the Northern Gateway pipeline. The rejection is not entirely out-of-the-blue. Even before her surprising electoral win, Premier Christy Clark made it clear that Enbridge would need to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="360" height="240" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/James_Moore_poin_344576gm-a.jpg" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/James_Moore_poin_344576gm-a.jpg 360w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/James_Moore_poin_344576gm-a-300x200.jpg 300w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/James_Moore_poin_344576gm-a-20x13.jpg 20w" sizes="(max-width: 360px) 100vw, 360px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption><hr></figure><p><em>This is a guest post by Heather Libby</em>.<p>Earlier today, British Columbia Environment Minister Terry Lake gave notice that <a href="http://gatewaypanel.review-examen.gc.ca/clf-nsi/hm-eng.html" rel="noopener">the provincial government officially objects</a> to Enbridge&rsquo;s application for the <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/enbridge-northern-gateway">Northern Gateway pipeline. </a></p><p>The rejection is not entirely out-of-the-blue. Even before her surprising electoral win, Premier Christy Clark made it clear that Enbridge would need to meet <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/national-energy-strategy-must-address-bc-pipeline-worries/article4446502/" rel="noopener">5 distinct conditions</a> before she would consider giving the province&rsquo;s blessing to the project, including marine and land oil spill prevention and respect for First Nations treaty rights (although later in the campaign, First Nations &lsquo;treaty rights&rsquo; <a href="http://fnbc.info/category/tags/christy-clark" rel="noopener">morphed into</a> &lsquo;economic benefits&rsquo;).</p><p>In their official statement, the BC government made it clear that the steps taken by Enbridge to date <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2013/05/31/bc-northern-gateway-rejected.html" rel="noopener">were not enough to meet those conditions</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p>&ldquo;British Columbia thoroughly reviewed all of the evidence and submissions made to the panel and asked substantive questions about the project, including its route, spill response capacity and financial structure to handle any incidents. Our questions were not satisfactorily answered during these hearings. &hellip;Our government does not believe that a certificate should be granted before these important questions are answered," said Minister Lake.</p>
</blockquote><p>In a press scrum after the announcement, Federal Heritage Minister James Moore, the highest ranking Conservative in British Columbia, told <a href="http://www.cknw.com/news/vancouver/story.aspx?ID=1974602" rel="noopener">CKNW980&rsquo;s Shane Woodford</a> that the Federal government agrees with BC&rsquo;s five conditions, and acknowledges that public support is not behind the Enbridge project:</p><blockquote>
<p>&ldquo;We believe in waiting for the environmental assessment to come back and letting science drive this. As I said, the conditions the Premier has put forward, we agree with. These projects can't go forward without the public's support, and the public's support will never be behind these projects unless companies can demonstrate that they're being good stewards of the natural environment."&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote><p>Moore&rsquo;s answer, while cautious, is surprising.</p><p><!--break--></p><p>Last year the federal Conservative government <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/budget-bill-gives-harper-cabinet-free-hand-on-environmental-assessments/article4105864/" rel="noopener">included legislative changes</a> in its omnibus budget implementation bill, <a href="http://openparliament.ca/bills/41-1/C-38/" rel="noopener">Bill-C38</a>, that gave cabinet power to override the National Energy Board on decisions regarding pipeline approvals and to order alternative environmental assessment processes.</p><p>In non-governmentese, that means the Harper Conservatives could choose to overrule BC&rsquo;s objections to the project and allow it anyway. Moore&rsquo;s comments today and their emphasis on public support do not seem to support that option, particularly since <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/02/06/northern-gateway-pipeline-poll_n_2630173.html" rel="noopener">only 35% of British Columbians support</a> the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline project application.</p><p>Time will tell if Minister Moore is forced to retract or &lsquo;clarify&rsquo; his comments.&nbsp;</p></p>
<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[ictinus]]></dc:creator>
						<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[bc rejects northern gateway proposal]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Enbridge]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>    </item>
	    <item>
      <title>Premier Christy Clark&#8217;s New Government Formally Rejects Northern Gateway Pipeline Project</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/bc-government-formally-rejects-northern-gateway-pipeline-project/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/2013/05/31/bc-government-formally-rejects-northern-gateway-pipeline-project/</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 18:16:12 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[The newly formed BC provincial government, under the leadership of Premier Christy Clark, has formally rejected the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline proposal.&#160; A news release put out this morning from BC&#39;s Minister of the Environment, Terry Lake, states that there remain concerns about northern gateway project proponent Enbridge&#39;s ability to deal with oil spills: &#34;British...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="640" height="356" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/enbridge.png" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/enbridge.png 640w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/enbridge-300x167.png 300w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/enbridge-450x250.png 450w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/enbridge-20x11.png 20w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption><hr></figure><p>The newly formed BC provincial government, under the leadership of Premier Christy Clark, has formally rejected the proposed <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/enbridge-northern-gateway">Northern Gateway pipeline proposal.&nbsp;</a><p>A <a href="http://www.newsroom.gov.bc.ca/2013/05/bc-makes-final-written-argument-to-northern-gateway-panel.html" rel="noopener">news release put out this morning from BC's Minister of the Environment,</a> Terry Lake, states that there remain concerns about northern gateway project proponent Enbridge's ability to deal with oil spills:</p><blockquote>
<p>"British Columbia thoroughly reviewed all of the evidence and submissions made to the panel and asked substantive questions about the project including its route, spill response capacity and financial structure to handle any incidents," Lake said. "Our questions were not satisfactorily answered during these hearings." Lake said Northern Gateway has not presented adequate evidence to explain how they would respond to a major spill, and for that reason the B.C. government can't issue a certificate for the pipeline to go ahead.</p>
</blockquote><p>The BC government's <a href="http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/main/docs/2013/BC-Submission-to-NGP-JointReviewPanel_130531.pdf" rel="noopener">formal submission to the Enbridge northern gateway pipeline project review panel can be downloaded here. [PDF]</a></p><p><!--break--></p><p>In the introduction section of the BC government's submission, it is made clear that while Enbridge has made assurances that it has the ability to clean up a large oil spill on BC's coastal waters, the company provides very little details on how it would actually go about dealing with such a disaster:</p><blockquote>
<p>"With respect to the pipeline itself, NG [northern gateway] has asserted that it will be able to effectively respond to all spills&hellip; however, NG has presented little evidence about how it will respond in the event of a spill."</p>
</blockquote><p>The Enbridge gateway pipeline would see 500 oil tankers a year plying the narrow and treacherous waters off BC's northwest coast.<a href="http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/sfu-research-says-northern-gateway-underestimates-risk-oil-182852770.html" rel="noopener"> Many experts agree,</a> that the question is not whether a major oil spill would occur, but when. A major spill on BC's coastal waters would put at risk billions of dollars already contributing to the BC economy through seafood harvesting, whale watching, eco-tourism and sport fishing.</p><p>Enbridge has run into trouble in the past for its inability to effectively deal with oil spills from their pipelines, with the most notable of late being&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enbridge_oil_spill" rel="noopener">a massive pipeline rupture in 2010 on Michigan's Kalamazoo river</a>&nbsp;that is still being <a href="http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2013/03/epa_orders_enbridge_to_do_addi.html" rel="noopener">cleaned up today.&nbsp;</a>The province's review notes Enbridge's history of spills, stating that:</p><blockquote>
<p>"While the [northern gateway] project will be new, and built using modern technology, the fact remains that pipeline spills do happen. Indeed, Enbridge had 11 releases greater that 1000 barrels between 2002 and 2012."</p>
</blockquote><p>The fate of the Enbridge gateway pipeline now lays squarely on Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his government, as Executive Director of <a href="http://dogwoodinitiative.org/" rel="noopener">BC's Dogwood Intiative, Will Horter explains:</a></p><blockquote><p>
	&ldquo;Ottawa could still grant a certificate for Enbridge while relying on promises to make the project better after the review, but today B.C. has clearly said that a certificate should not be granted. Since the public process is now over, this would mean any changes Enbridge might make to their proposal would presumably be evaluated behind closed doors. After the backlash over the HST, we&rsquo;re not expecting either Ottawa or Victoria to make backroom changes to their position on such a controversial proposal.&rdquo;</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>
	<em>Image Credit:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.northerngateway.ca/economic-opportunity/northern-gateway-tanker-safety-video/" rel="noopener">Enbridge Tanker Safety Video</a>, screen shot.</em></p></blockquote></p>
<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[ictinus]]></dc:creator>
						<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[bc rejects northern gateway proposal]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[enbridge northern gateway]]></category>    </item>
	</channel>
</rss>