
<rss 
	version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<atom:link href="https://thenarwhal.ca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<title>The Narwhal | News on Climate Change, Environmental Issues in Canada</title>
	<link>https://thenarwhal.ca</link>
  <description>The Narwhal’s team of investigative journalists dives deep to tell stories about the natural world in Canada you can’t find anywhere else.</description>
  <language>en-US</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2026 The Narwhal News Society</copyright>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 14:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	    <item>
      <title>Tar Sands Tax Loophole Cost US Oil Spill Fund $48 Million in 2012, Will Cost $400 Million by 2017</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/tar-sands-tax-loophole-cost-us-oil-spill-fund-48-million-2012-will-cost-400-million-2017/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/2013/04/03/tar-sands-tax-loophole-cost-us-oil-spill-fund-48-million-2012-will-cost-400-million-2017/</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 23:34:46 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[A tax loophole exempting tar sands pipeline operators from paying an eight-cent tax per barrel of oil they transport in the US is costing the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund millions of dollars every year. With expected increases in tar sands oil production over the next five years, this loophole may have deprived US...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="640" height="480" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/arkansas_1.jpg" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/arkansas_1.jpg 640w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/arkansas_1-627x470.jpg 627w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/arkansas_1-450x338.jpg 450w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/arkansas_1-20x15.jpg 20w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption></figure> <p>A <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/2013/04/02/pipelines-carrying-tar-sands-crude-us-don-t-pay-federal-oil-spill-fund">tax loophole</a> exempting tar sands pipeline operators from paying an eight-cent tax per barrel of oil they transport in the US is costing the federal <a href="http://www.epa.gov/osweroe1/content/learning/oilfund.htm" rel="noopener">Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund</a> millions of dollars every year. With expected increases in tar sands oil production over the next five years, this loophole may have deprived US citizens of $400-million dollars worth of critical oil-spill protection funds come 2017.</p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://democrats.naturalresources.house.gov/sites/democrats.naturalresources.house.gov/files/documents/2012-07-31_IRS_Tarsands_Report.pdf" rel="noopener">report</a> by the US <a href="http://democrats.naturalresources.house.gov" rel="noopener">Natural Resources Committee</a> the federal government pays for immediate oil-spill response from the Liability Trust Fund which is supported by an excise tax on all crude oil and gas products in the US.</p>
<p>But in 2011 the Internal Revenue Service exempted tar sands oil from the tax, saying the substance did not fit the characterization of crude oil.</p>
<p>This exemption has come under scrutiny this week after <a href="http://desmogblog.com/2013/04/01/everything-you-need-know-about-exxon-pegasus-tar-sands-spill" rel="noopener">Exxon Mobil's Pegasus pipeline ruptured</a> in Mayflower, Arkansas, releasing 300,000 litres of tar sands oil and water into a residential neighbourhood and surrounding wetlands. Because the line carried tar sands-derived oil from Alberta, Exxon was <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/2013/04/02/pipelines-carrying-tar-sands-crude-us-don-t-pay-federal-oil-spill-fund">exempt</a> from paying into the spill liability fund for the corrosive fuel's potential cleanup.</p>
<p><!--break--></p>
<p>The Pegasus pipeline was built in the 1940s to carry regular crude north from the Gulf Coast. In 2006, Exxon <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20060420005482/en/ExxonMobil-Pipeline-Company-Delivers-Canadian-Crude-Gulf" rel="noopener">reversed</a> the flow of the 1300 kilometre line in order to transport tar sands diluted bitumen from Illinois to the coast.</p>
<p><a href="http://democrats.naturalresources.house.gov/sites/democrats.naturalresources.house.gov/files/documents/2012-07-31_IRS_Tarsands_Report.pdf" rel="noopener">According</a> to the Natural Resources Committee, "the spill response fund is currently at risk from running out of money because of the combined costs of BP's Deepwater Horizon spill and Enbridge's Kalamazoo spill of tar sands oil&hellip;And Enbridge could still file a claim against the fund to recoup some of its costs because the company has spent well over the liability cap of $350 million for such spills."</p>
<p>The Enbridge disaster in Michigan's Kalamazoo river has cost over <a href="http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130401/federal-agencies-asked-delay-keystone-over-pipeline-safety-issues" rel="noopener">$820 million</a>, making it the most expensive onshore cleanup in US history.</p>
<p>Enbridge, the company currently vying to build a 1172 kilometre-long pipeline from Alberta to the British Columbia coast, currently has <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/10/30/pipelines-supertankers-and-earthquakes-oh-my-enbridge-has-no-spill-response-plan-northern-gateway-pipeline" rel="noopener">no spill-response plan</a> &ndash; for either onshore or offshore spills &ndash; prepared for the project.</p>
<p>During cross-examination in the Northern Gateway Pipeline hearings in BC, <a href="http://www.newsroom.gov.bc.ca/2012/10/bc-cross-examination-enbridge-answers-leave-more-questions.html" rel="noopener">Enbridge admitted</a> they will have no spill response plan until six months before the proposed tar sands line will begin operation.&nbsp;</p>
<p>An investigation in the Enbridge Kalamazoo disaster found the company &ndash; due to "pervasive organizational failures" &ndash; improperly respond to the pipeline breach. The US National Transportation Safety Board likened Enbridge employees to the <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/enbridge-slammed-for-keystone-kops-response-to-michigan-spill/article4402752/" rel="noopener">Keystone Kops</a> &ndash; a clumsy, incompetent troups of cops from the silent films of the early 20th century.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://thecanadian.org/item/1685-ray-grigg-dilbit-silence" rel="noopener">estimated cleanup cost</a> for conventional oil run at about $2000 per barrel of oil. Tar sands diluted bitumen cleanup is estimated to cost an average $29,000 per barrel of spilled oil.</p>
<p>The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund was established in the wake of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, when the enormous costs of oil spill recovery were first understood on a grand scale, to ensure adequate cleanup funds were available to protect local residents and ecosystems.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2010/06/15/206151/the-exxon-valdez-spill-bp-escrow/" rel="noopener">Climate Progress</a> reported in 2010, Exxon refused to shoulder the cost of cleanup in the Valdez, where more than 11 million gallons of crude oil contaminated almost 3000 kilometres of shoreline.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Exxon fought paying damages and appealed court decisions multiple times, and they have still not paid in full. Years of fighting and court appeals on Exxon&rsquo;s part finally concluded with a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2008 that found that Exxon only had to pay <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/media-center/publications/the-business-of-justice-how-the-supreme-court-putting-corporations-first" rel="noopener">$507.5 million</a> of the original 1994 court decree for $5 billion in punitive damages. And as of 2009, Exxon had paid only <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2009/06/exxon-valdez-500-million-interest-due/" rel="noopener">$383 million</a> of this $507.5 million to those who sued, stalling on the rest and fighting the $500 million in interest owed to fishermen and other small businesses from more than 12 years of litigation.</p>
<p>Twenty years later, some of the original plaintiffs are no longer alive to receive, or continue fighting for, their damages. <strong>An estimated 8,000 of the original Exxon Valdez plaintiffs <a href="http://themaritimeblog.com/exxon-valdez-marks-20-years/" rel="noopener">have died </a>since the spill while waiting for their compensation as Exxon fought them in court</strong>."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And as <a href="http://desmogblog.com/2013/04/03/can-we-trust-exxon-pay-pegasus-tar-sands-spill-cleanup" rel="noopener">DeSmogBlog's Ben Jervey</a> reports, Exxon has a long and litigious history of evading cleanup costs.</p>
<p>The US is facing a dramatic increase of tar sands oil imports. As the National Resource Committee estimates, production in the Alberta tar sands is projected to rise to over 2.7 million barrels per day in 2017. The tar sands industry <a href="http://www.vancouverobserver.com/blogs/climatesnapshot/more-oil-sands-pipeline-future-will-want-iea" rel="noopener">projects figures </a>as high as 5 million barrels per day in 2030 and 6 million per day in 2035. Currently approved projects have the capacity to produce 5.2 million barrels per day.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://democrats.naturalresources.house.gov/sites/democrats.naturalresources.house.gov/files/documents/2012-07-31_IRS_Tarsands_Report.pdf" rel="noopener"><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/Screen%20Shot%202013-04-03%20at%203.23.37%20PM.png"></a></p>
<p>
	&ldquo;Tar sands is already the dirtiest, riskiest oil around. It shouldn&rsquo;t get a free ride from the U.S. taxpayer when it comes to paying into this vital spill response fund,&rdquo; <a href="http://democrats.naturalresources.house.gov/reports/tax-free-tar-sands" rel="noopener">said </a>Rep. Markey, the Ranking Member of the Natural Resources Committee. &ldquo;Oil companies already receive outrageous tax subsidies that total billions of dollars and there is no defensible reason for this oil spill free ride to be added to that dubious list of loopholes.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Regardless of how many barrels of tar sands oil will be traversing US soil, none of them should be exempt from spill liability taxes. If anything, corrosive diluted bitumen should be taxed more for the inherent dangers it present to local ecologies and communities during its <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/01/opinion/the-tar-sands-disaster.html?_r=0" rel="noopener">production</a>, <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/09/18/alberta-bitumen-threatens-health-communities-living-near-refineries-u-s-forestethics-reports" rel="noopener">refining</a>, and <a href="http://insideclimatenews.org/topic/dilbit-disaster" rel="noopener">transport</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Linnitt]]></dc:creator>
						<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[bitumen]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[corrosive]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[dilbit]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[diluted bitumen]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Enbridge]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Exxon Mobil]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Kalamazoo]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Northern Gateway]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[oilsands]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>			<media:content url="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/arkansas_1-627x470.jpg" fileSize="4096" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="627" height="470"><media:credit></media:credit></media:content><media:thumbnail url="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/arkansas_1-627x470.jpg" width="627" height="470" />    </item>
	    <item>
      <title>Because &#8216;Bitumen is not Oil,&#8217; Pipelines Carrying Tar Sands Crude Don&#8217;t Pay into US Oil Spill Fund</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/pipelines-carrying-tar-sands-crude-us-don-t-pay-federal-oil-spill-fund/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/2013/04/02/pipelines-carrying-tar-sands-crude-us-don-t-pay-federal-oil-spill-fund/</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 22:30:34 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[As Think Progress has just reported, a bizarre technicality allowed Exxon Mobil to avoid paying into the federal oil spill fund responsible for cleanup after the company&#39;s Pegasus pipeline released 12,000 barrels of tar sands oil and water into the town of Mayflower, Arkansas. According to a thirty-year-old law in the US, diluted bitumen coming...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="640" height="427" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/duck.jpg" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/duck.jpg 640w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/duck-300x200.jpg 300w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/duck-450x300.jpg 450w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/duck-20x13.jpg 20w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption></figure> <p>As <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/04/02/1810571/exxons-duck-killing-pipeline-doesnt-pay-taxes-to-oil-spill-cleanup-fund/" rel="noopener">Think Progress</a> has just reported, a bizarre technicality allowed Exxon Mobil to avoid paying into the federal oil spill fund responsible for cleanup after the company's <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/2013/04/01/everything-you-need-know-about-exxon-pegasus-tar-sands-spill" rel="noopener">Pegasus pipeline</a> released 12,000 barrels of tar sands oil and water into the town of Mayflower, Arkansas.</p>
<p>According to a thirty-year-old law in the US, diluted bitumen coming from the Alberta tar sands is not classified as oil, meaning pipeline operators planning to transport the <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/many-problems-tar-sands-pipelines" rel="noopener">corrosive substance</a> across the US &ndash; with proposed pipelines like the Keystone XL &ndash; are exempt from paying into the federal <a href="http://www.epa.gov/osweroe1/content/learning/oilfund.htm" rel="noopener">Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund</a>.</p>
<p>News that Exxon was spared from contributing the 8-cents-per-barrel fee to the clean-up fund added insult to injury this week as cleanup crews discovered <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/04/02/1810571/exxons-duck-killing-pipeline-doesnt-pay-taxes-to-oil-spill-cleanup-fund/" rel="noopener">oil-soaked ducks</a> covered in "low-quality Wabasca Heavy Crude from Alberta." Yesterday officials said 10 live ducks were found covered in oil, as well as a number of oiled ducks already deceased.</p>
<p><!--break--></p>
<p><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/duck%20arkansas%202.jpg"></p>
<p><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/duck%20arkansas%203.jpg"><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/duck%20Arkansas%204.jpg"></p>
<p><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/duck%20Arkansas%205.jpg"></p>
<p>Photographer Eilish Palmer, known as <a href="http://www.facebook.com/hawkcenter" rel="noopener">Lady with a Camera</a>, has been working with <a href="http://www.facebook.com/hawkcenter" rel="noopener">HAWK</a> (Helping Arkansas Wild Kritters), a wildlife rehabilitation centre, to locate and help ducks and other animals affected by the spill.</p>
<p>When I connected with Eilish on the phone today, she was outside in the rain searching for more oil-covered wildlife: "I'm actually out in the woods right now looking for animals. We just found two dead ducks and one live one&hellip;We actually saw a dead wood duck and we saw its mate, it couldn't fly away, only walk. It was pretty saturated."&nbsp;</p>
<p>Eilish said HAWK was the first responder for affected wildlife in the area but has since seen Exxon establish a local mobile unit to treat animals on site. "As the number of animals increased Exxon brought in their own rehabilitation centre because we were taking the animals to a centre about an hour away. HAWK doesn't have a mobile unit."</p>
<p>In addition to ducks, the team working with HAWK also found this oil-laden male muskrat, suggesting a number of species may be affected.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/muskrat%20arkansas.jpg"></p>
<p>Faulkner Country Judge Allen Dodson <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/04/02/1810571/exxons-duck-killing-pipeline-doesnt-pay-taxes-to-oil-spill-cleanup-fund/" rel="noopener">said</a> "I'm an animal lover, a wildlife lover, as probably most of the people here are. We don't like to see that. No one does."</p>
<p>He added, "Crude oil is crude oil. None of it is real good to touch."</p>
<p>The Exxon spill leaked 80,000 gallons of oil into an Arkansas residential area, causing the evacuation of 22 homes. This weekend Exxon Mobil Pipeline Co. president Gary Pruessing <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/02/us/arkansas-pipeline-spill/index.html" rel="noopener">told</a> displaced homeowners, "If you have been harmed by this spill then we're going to look at how to make that right."&nbsp;</p>
<p>According to InsideClimate News, Exxon is currently <a href="http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130402/oil-spill-clean-arkansas-exxon-running-show-not-federal-agencies" rel="noopener">preventing the media </a>from accessing the spill scene. Today the Arkansas Attourney General&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/02/us/arkansas-pipeline-spill/index.html" rel="noopener">announced</a> an investigation into the cause of the 60-plus-year-old pipeline's rupture.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Pegasus pipeline was originally built in the 1940s and was recently dormant for four years before its flow was reversed to carry Alberta diluted bitumen from Illinois to the Gulf Coast. In 2006, Exxon called the line's reversal a <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20060420005482/en/ExxonMobil-Pipeline-Company-Delivers-Canadian-Crude-Gulf" rel="noopener">win-win</a> for the people of the Gulf Coast and Canada.</p>
<p>The revelation that companies transporting diluted bitumen in the US have some concerned about pre-existing pipelines, as well as the proposed Keystone XL pipeline that will transport the tar sands-derived oil across a number of ecologically sensitive areas.&nbsp;</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/energy/files/tarsandssafetyrisks.pdf" rel="noopener">NRDC</a>, in 2011 a number of pipelines carried Alberta bitumen in the US:</p>
<p><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/Tar%20Sands%20DilBit%20Pipelines%20Map%20NRDC_0.png"></p>
<p>Although the spread of <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/09/18/alberta-bitumen-threatens-health-communities-living-near-refineries-u-s-forestethics-reports" rel="noopener">oil refineries</a> across the US receiving bitumen suggests the network of tar sands oil transport is much more widely spread across the States:</p>
<p><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/Bitumen%20Refineries%20in%20US.png"></p>
<p>The network potentially connecting bitumen-carrying pipelines with other pipelines is quite extensive across the US:</p>
<p><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/Pipeline%20Network%20Map.png"></p>
<p>Last week a coalition of environmental groups, communities and inviduals <a href="http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130401/federal-agencies-asked-delay-keystone-over-pipeline-safety-issues?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20solveclimate%2Fblog%20%28InsideClimate%20News%29" rel="noopener">petitioned</a> the US EPA and Pipelines and Hazardous Materials Safety Association (PHMSA) to place a <a href="http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/628610-nwf-dilbit-petition-march-2013.html" rel="noopener">moratorium</a> on pending tar sands pipelines, including the Keystone XL pipeline, until new safety rules are established.&nbsp;</p>
<p>"Simply put, diluted bitumen and conventional crude oil are not the same substance," the petitioners <a href="http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130401/federal-agencies-asked-delay-keystone-over-pipeline-safety-issues?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20solveclimate%2Fblog%20%28InsideClimate%20News%29" rel="noopener">wrote</a>. "There is increasing evidence that the transport of diluted bitumen is putting America's public safety at risk. Current regulations fail to protect the public against those risks. Instead, regulations &hellip; treat diluted bitumen and conventional crude the same."</p>
<p><em>Image Credit: Refinery map by<a href="http://forestethics.org//sites/forestethics.huang.radicaldesigns.org/files/ForestEthics-Refineries-Report-Sept2012.pdf" rel="noopener"> ForestEthics</a>. Wildlife photos courtesy of Eilish Palmer,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.facebook.com/Ladywithacamera" rel="noopener">Lady with a Camera</a>, used with permission.</em></p>

<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Linnitt]]></dc:creator>
						<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Alberta]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[corrosive]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[diluted bitumen]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[exxon]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Keystone XL]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[mayflower]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[oilsands]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[pipelines]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>			<media:content url="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/duck-300x200.jpg" fileSize="4096" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="300" height="200"><media:credit></media:credit></media:content><media:thumbnail url="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/duck-300x200.jpg" width="300" height="200" />    </item>
	</channel>
</rss>