
<rss 
	version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Narwhal | News on Climate Change, Environmental Issues in Canada</title>
	<link>https://thenarwhal.ca</link>
  <description><![CDATA[Deep Dives, Cold Facts, &#38; Pointed Commentary]]></description>
  <language>en-US</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2026 The Narwhal News Society</copyright>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:20:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	    <item>
      <title>Experts Slow Clap for Canada’s Late and &#8216;Inadequate&#8217; Climate Target</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/experts-slow-clap-canada-s-late-and-inadequate-climate-target/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/2015/05/20/experts-slow-clap-canada-s-late-and-inadequate-climate-target/</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 22:11:46 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[Months after most countries revealed national climate targets in the lead up to the December 2015 UN climate summit, Canada has finally announced its contribution to global emissions reductions &#8212; and its commitment is getting a failing grade from the climate community. The NewClimate Institute rated Canada&#39;s target as &#34;inadequate.&#34; &#8220;In rating Canada &#8216;inadequate,&#8217; our...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="640" height="471" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/leona-aglukkaq-1.jpg" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/leona-aglukkaq-1.jpg 640w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/leona-aglukkaq-1-639x470.jpg 639w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/leona-aglukkaq-1-450x331.jpg 450w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/leona-aglukkaq-1-20x15.jpg 20w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption><hr></figure><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">Months after most countries revealed national climate targets in the lead up to the December 2015 UN climate summit, Canada has finally announced its contribution to global emissions reductions &mdash; and its commitment is getting a failing grade from the climate community. </span><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;"><span style="line-height: 1.1em;"><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">The <a href="https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CCEQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnewclimate.org%2F&amp;ei=pgddVZX1H4q3ogSc1IOQDA&amp;usg=AFQjCNEJ4X8RR6LOysO_jz4zaOO_iy5aNw&amp;sig2=Jve5fQAD4b3gG8Oxt_Sr6g&amp;bvm=bv.93990622,d.cGU" rel="noopener">NewClimate Institute</a> </span></span>rated Canada's target as "inadequate."</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">&ldquo;In rating Canada &lsquo;inadequate,&rsquo; our lowest rating, we note that other governments will have to take a lot more action to make up for the hole left by Canada&rsquo;s lack of ambition &mdash; if warming is to be held to 2&#730;C,&rdquo; <span style="line-height: 1.1em;">said Niklas H&ouml;hne of the institute. </span></span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">Canada is promising to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 30 per cent from 2005 levels by 2030.</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">According to Climate Action International, Canada is unlikely to meet that target, even though it is much weaker than commitments made by other industrial nations.</span></p><p><!--break--></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">Beyond that, Canada is relying on some fancy &lsquo;climate credit&rsquo; footwork to avoid limiting emissions from its fastest growing source of carbon pollution: the Alberta oilsands.</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">Climate Action International said Canada is </span><a href="http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/canada.html" style="line-height: 1.1em;" rel="noopener">planning on using forestry credits &ldquo;to avoid reducing emissions</a><span style="line-height: 1.1em;"> from other sources such as fossil fuels.&rdquo; Because Canada is home to 10 per cent of the world&rsquo;s forests that could translate into credits for an estimated 63 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, or about as much carbon emissions as the entire country of Sweden produced in 2011.</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">If you exclude forestry credits from Canada&rsquo;s climate profile, emissions are actually projected to surpass 2005 levels &mdash; by one per cent in 2020 and by eight per cent in 2030.</span></p><p class="rtecenter"><a href="http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/canada.html" rel="noopener"><span style="line-height: 1.1em;"><img decoding="async" alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/Canada%20climate%20target%202015.png" style="width: 800px; height: 601px;"></span></a></p><p class="rtecenter"><span style="line-height: 1.1em;"><span style="font-size:11px;"><em>Image from Climate Action International's <a href="http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/canada.html" rel="noopener">Canada climate profile</a>. Click image for more detail.</em></span></span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">Emissions from the oilsands, Canada&rsquo;s fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions have increased 79 per cent since 2005. They currently account for nine per cent of Canada&rsquo;s total emissions and that portion is expected to jump to 14 per cent by 2020.</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">Louise Jeffery from the <a href="https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CB0QFjAA&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pik-potsdam.de%2F&amp;ei=aAddVZn-IIHjoATgmYCAAw&amp;usg=AFQjCNEaee2qiv8lT2qrNY54B-sqr0B9jA&amp;sig2=o3UezLLsLUGZzx45eoE4yw&amp;bvm=bv.93990622,d.cGU" rel="noopener">Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research</a> said Canada is relying heavily on its forests while skirting its responsibility to curtail emissions from the oilsands.</span></p><p>&nbsp;&ldquo;The accounting options Canada proposes using are fraught with difficulties,&rdquo; he said, &ldquo;not least because Canada is no longer a party to the Kyoto Protocol, so it can use much looser rules.&rdquo;</p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">Canada used its withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol in 2012 to weaken its climate targets.</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">Climate Action International argues Canada&rsquo;s accounting approach is &ldquo;fraught with difficulties, including substantial potential for double counting [and] asymmetric accounting&rdquo; because it doesn&rsquo;t adhere to the same standards as other polluters still signed on to the Kyoto Protocol.</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">Bill Hare from <a href="https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CB4QFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fclimateanalytics.org%2F&amp;ei=iwddVbStE4e0ogSNsoGYBQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNFSR5MJMIZ75H9bFNy0Ue8gpAJMfQ&amp;sig2=yCX5nKsq4IoZC-SnsbmCcg&amp;bvm=bv.93990622,d.cGU" rel="noopener">Climate Analytics </a>said although Canada has announced its climate target, the country is avoiding introducing meaningful climate legislation.</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">&ldquo;It&rsquo;s clear Canada is not serious about climate action,&rdquo; he said.&nbsp;&ldquo;Without any new policies in place, its emissions are expected to balloon through to 2030, with the tar sands taking up a significant proportion.&ldquo;</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">Others have pointed out that Canada, on top of not doing its fair share, is also missing out on the opportunity to transition to cleaner sources of energy.</span></p><p class="rtecenter"><span style="line-height: 1.1em;"><img decoding="async" alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/WRI%20comparison%20G7%20INDC%27s.png" style="width: 745px; height: 398px;"></span></p><p class="rtecenter"><span style="line-height: 1.1em;"><span style="font-size:11px;"><em>Comparison of emissions reductions from the World Resources Institute.</em></span></span></p><p>With this inadequate target, Canada will not tap into its large potential to reduce fossil fuel consumption,&rdquo; said&nbsp;Kornelis Blok, of Ecofys. &ldquo;Canada risks becoming a laggard in clean innovation, such as energy efficiency.&rdquo;</p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">A <a href="http://cleanenergycanada.org/2014/12/02/tracking-the-energy-revolution-canada/" rel="noopener">report released by Clean Energy Canada in late 2014 </a>showed the alternative and low-carbon energy sector is making significant gains in the Canadian economy and jobs market, but isn&rsquo;t getting the support from the federal government it needs.</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.1em;">&ldquo;Every major industrial sector in Canada &mdash; from the aerospace industry to the oilsands &mdash;has gotten off the ground with support from the federal government. But in the clean-energy sector, the federal government is really missing in action,&rdquo; Merran Smith, director of Clean Energy Canada, said.</span></p><p><span style="font-size:11px;"><span style="line-height: 1.1em;"><em>Image Credit: Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq via Metro News</em></span></span></p></p>
<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Linnitt]]></dc:creator>
						<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Bill Hare]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Canada]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Clean Energy Canada]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Climate]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Climate Action International]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Climate Analytics]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[climate change]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[climate laggard]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[climate target]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Ecofys]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[emissions]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[global warming]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[INDC]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Louise Jeffery]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[NewClimate Institute]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Niklas Höhne]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[oilsands]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[UNFCCC]]></category>    </item>
	</channel>
</rss>
