
<rss 
	version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Narwhal | News on Climate Change, Environmental Issues in Canada</title>
	<link>https://thenarwhal.ca</link>
  <description><![CDATA[Deep Dives, Cold Facts, &#38; Pointed Commentary]]></description>
  <language>en-US</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2026 The Narwhal News Society</copyright>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 02:25:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	    <item>
      <title>Future of Our Climate Depends on Next Fifteen Years of Investment, New Report States</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/future-our-climate-depends-next-fifteen-years-investment-new-report-states/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/2014/09/16/future-our-climate-depends-next-fifteen-years-investment-new-report-states/</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:48:31 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[Investments in renewable energies and low-carbon infrastructure can help the environment and the economy at the same time, says a comprehensive new report released Tuesday. The report &#8212; Better Growth Better Climate &#8212; found that about US $90 trillion will likely be invested in infrastructure in the world&#8217;s cities, agriculture and energy systems over the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="640" height="427" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/oilsands-climate-investment.jpg" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/oilsands-climate-investment.jpg 640w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/oilsands-climate-investment-300x200.jpg 300w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/oilsands-climate-investment-450x300.jpg 450w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/oilsands-climate-investment-20x13.jpg 20w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption><hr></figure><p>Investments in renewable energies and low-carbon infrastructure can help the environment and the economy at the same time, says a comprehensive new report released Tuesday.<p>The report &mdash; <a href="http://static.newclimateeconomy.report/TheNewClimateEconomyReport.pdf" rel="noopener">Better Growth Better Climate</a> &mdash; found that about US $90 trillion will likely be invested in infrastructure in the world&rsquo;s cities, agriculture and energy systems over the next 15 years, unleashing multiple benefits including jobs, health, business productivity and quality of life.</p><p>&ldquo;The decisions we make now will determine the future of our economy and our climate,&rdquo; Nicholas Stern, Co-Chair of the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, said in a <a href="http://newclimateeconomy.net/content/press-release-economic-growth-and-action-climate-change-can-now-be-achieved-together-finds" rel="noopener">media release</a>.</p><p>&ldquo;If we choose low-carbon investment we can generate strong, high-quality growth &ndash; not just in the future, but now. But if we continue down the high-carbon route, climate change will bring severe risks to long-term prosperity,&rdquo; he said.</p><p>Felipe Calder&oacute;n, Chair of the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, said the report refutes the idea that humankind must choose between fighting climate change or growing the world&rsquo;s economy.</p><p>&ldquo;That is a false dilemma,&rdquo; Calder&oacute;n said. &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s report details compelling evidence on how technological change is driving new opportunities to improve growth, create jobs, boost company profits and spur economic development. The report sends a clear message to government and private sector leaders: we can improve the economy and tackle climate change at the same time.&rdquo;</p><p><!--break--></p><p>The 71-page report was presented to governments and business and finance leaders at a global launch event at the UN headquarters in New York City, attended by United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. The report arrives just one week before the <a href="http://www.un.org/climatechange/summit/" rel="noopener">UN Climate Summit</a>.</p><p>It concluded that countries at all levels of income have the opportunity to build lasting economic growth at the same time as reducing the immense risks of climate change.</p><p>&ldquo;This is made possible by structural and technological changes unfolding in the global economy and opportunities for greater economic efficiency,&rdquo; the report said. &ldquo;The capital for the necessary investments is available, and the potential for innovation is vast. What is needed is strong political leadership and credible, consistent policies.&rdquo;</p><p>The next 15 years will be critical, the report said, as the global economy will grow by more than half, a billion more people will live in cities, and rapid technological advances will continue to transform society.</p><p>&ldquo;The next 15 years of investment will also determine the future of the world&rsquo;s climate system. Climate change caused by past greenhouse gas emissions is already&nbsp;having serious economic consequences, especially in more exposed areas of the world.&rdquo;</p><p>The report added that without stronger action in the next 10 to 15 years it is near certain that global average warming will exceed 2&deg;C, the level the international community has agreed not to cross.</p><p>&ldquo;On current trends, warming could exceed 4&deg;C by the end of the century, with extreme and potentially irreversible impacts. By building up greenhouse gas concentrations and locking in the stock of high-carbon assets, delay in reducing emissions makes it progressively more expensive to shift towards a low-carbon economy.&rdquo;</p><p>The report noted, however, that future economic growth does not have to copy the high-carbon, unevenly distributed model of the past.</p><p>It said there is now huge potential to invest in greater efficiency, structural transformation and technological change in three key systems of the economy &mdash; cities, land use and energy systems. &nbsp;</p><p>Describing cities as engines of economic growth, the report said how they develop in the future will be critical to the global economy and climate change. &ldquo;More compact and connected urban development, built around mass public transport, can create cities that are economically dynamic and healthier, and that have lower emissions.&rdquo;</p><p>In terms of land use, the report says productivity will determine whether the world can feed a population projected to grow to over eight billion by 2030, while sustaining natural environments. &ldquo;Food production can be increased, forests protected and land use emissions cut by raising crop and livestock productivity, using new technologies and comprehensive approaches to soil and water management.&rdquo;</p><p>With regard to energy systems, the report said humankind is on the cusp of a clean energy future. &ldquo;Coal is riskier and more expensive than it used to be, with growing import dependence and rising air pollution. Rapidly falling costs, particularly of wind and solar power, could lead renewable and other low-carbon energy sources to account for more than half of all new electricity generation over the next 15 years.&rdquo;</p><p>The report also states faulty policy and a reliance on market economics has led to increased emissions. Annual subsidies for clean energy amount to around $100 billion each year, while subsidies for polluting fossil fuels are at about $600 billion. &nbsp;</p><p>&ldquo;Phasing out fossil fuel subsidies can improve growth and release resources that can be reallocated to benefit people on low incomes. A strong and predictable price on carbon will drive higher energy productivity and provide new fiscal revenues, which can be used to cut other taxes. Well-designed regulations, such as higher performance standards for appliances and vehicles, are also needed.&rdquo;</p><p>The report also said that low-carbon forms of infrastructure are essential to reduce current emissions trajectories. Stimulating innovation in technologies, business models and social practices can also reduce emissions while driving economic growth.</p><p>As part of its 10 key recommendations, the report asks politicians to accelerate a low-carbon transformation by integrating climate change considerations into core economic decision-making processes, enter into a strong, lasting and equitable international climate agreement, phase out subsidies for fossil fuels and agricultural inputs as well as incentives for urban sprawl, and introduce strong, predictable carbon prices as part of good fiscal reform and good business practice.</p><p><em>Image Credit: <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/kk/14725319684/" rel="noopener">Kris Krug</a> via Flickr</em></p></p>
<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Rose]]></dc:creator>
						<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Better Growth Better Climate]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Climate]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[climate change]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Felipe Calderón]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Global Commission on the Economy and Climate]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[global warming]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[investment]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Nicholas Stern]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Policy]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[UN Climate Summit]]></category>    </item>
	    <item>
      <title>Lord Stern: We’ve Underestimated Economic Costs of Global Warming</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/lord-stern-we-ve-underestimated-economic-costs-global-warming/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/2014/06/20/lord-stern-we-ve-underestimated-economic-costs-global-warming/</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:41:23 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[Nicholas Stern, one of the world&#8217;s most influential economists, has come out with a new report showing that the future costs of climate change have been incredibly underestimated. The report, Endogenous growth, convexity of damages and climate risk, indicates it is even more important than previously thought that politicians quickly and aggressively stop unchecked climate...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="359" height="480" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Nicholas_Stern_-_World_Economic_Forum_Annual_Meeting_Davos_2009.jpg" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Nicholas_Stern_-_World_Economic_Forum_Annual_Meeting_Davos_2009.jpg 359w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Nicholas_Stern_-_World_Economic_Forum_Annual_Meeting_Davos_2009-352x470.jpg 352w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Nicholas_Stern_-_World_Economic_Forum_Annual_Meeting_Davos_2009-337x450.jpg 337w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Nicholas_Stern_-_World_Economic_Forum_Annual_Meeting_Davos_2009-15x20.jpg 15w" sizes="(max-width: 359px) 100vw, 359px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption><hr></figure><p><a href="http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/profile/nicholas-stern/" rel="noopener">Nicholas Stern</a>, one of the world&rsquo;s most influential economists, has come out with a new report showing that the future costs of climate change have been incredibly underestimated.<p>The report, <a href="http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Working-Paper-180-Dietz-and-Stern-2014.pdf" rel="noopener"><em>Endogenous growth, convexity of damages and climate risk</em></a>, indicates it is even more important than previously thought that politicians quickly and aggressively stop unchecked climate change caused by man-made carbon dioxide emissions.</p><p>Stern, a professor at the Grantham Institute at the London School of Economics, and his co-author Simon Dietz found that the current economic models used to calculate the cost of climate change are vastly inadequate and need to be updated so that proper decisions can be made about risks associated with global warming.</p><p>They said that even the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has cited the existing economic models and, as a result, has arrived at severely limited assumptions about the costs of global warming.</p><p>&ldquo;It is extremely important to understand the severe limitations of standard economic models, such as those cited in the IPCC report, which have made assumptions that simply do not reflect current knowledge about climate change and its potential impacts on the economy,&rdquo; Stern, a former chief economist with the World Bank, said in a <a href="http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/news/dietz_stern_june2014/" rel="noopener">media release</a>.</p><p><!--break--></p><p>&ldquo;I hope our paper will prompt other economists to strive for much better models which will help policy-makers and the public to recognize the immensity [of] the potential risks of unmanaged climate change. Models that assume that catastrophic damages are not possible fail to take account of the magnitude of the issues and the implications of the science.&rdquo;</p><p>The media release said Monday that Stern and Dietz modified some key features of the &lsquo;dynamic integrated climate-economy,&rsquo; or DICE, model, which was initially devised by William Nordhaus in the 1990s, to take into account the latest findings and some of the uncertainties about the major risks of climate change that are usually omitted.</p><p>The new model allows a wider range of values to be considered for climate sensitivity, which is the long-term change in global average temperature that would result from a doubling of the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, the release says.&nbsp;</p><p>The new model also includes a broader range of potential climate impacts, because the standard model tends to underestimate the potential economic damage that could be created by climate change, it added.</p><p>Dietz said the old economic model has been useful for economists who estimate the potential impacts of climate change but that the new model shows that some major improvements are needed before it can reflect the extent of the risks indicated by the science.</p><p>&ldquo;Our aim was to show how a new version of the model could produce a range of results that are much more representative of the science and economics of climate change, taking into account the uncertainties,&rdquo; Dietz said.</p><p>&ldquo;The new version of this standard economic model, for instance, suggests that the risks from climate change are bigger than portrayed by previous economic models and therefore strengthens the case for strong cuts in emissions of greenhouse gases.&rdquo;</p><p>Stern and Dietz said their research suggests a global carbon price should range from US $32 to $103/tCO2 by 2015 and rise to between $82 and $260/tCO2 by 2035.</p><p>They also found that that living standards could begin to decline later this century unless the growth in annual emissions of greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels is checked. Their peer-reviewed paper is scheduled for publication in <em>The Economic Journal</em>.</p><p><em>Image Credit: Stern at the 2009&nbsp;<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/worldeconomicforum/3488885852/in/set-72157610608337699" rel="noopener">World Economic Forum</a> via Flickr.</em></p></p>
<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Rose]]></dc:creator>
						<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Climate]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[climate change]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[economic models]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Economy]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[global warming]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[London School of Economics]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Nicholas Stern]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[risk]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Simon Dietz]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[The Economic Journal]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>    </item>
	</channel>
</rss>