
<rss 
	version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Narwhal | News on Climate Change, Environmental Issues in Canada</title>
	<link>https://thenarwhal.ca</link>
  <description><![CDATA[Deep Dives, Cold Facts, &#38; Pointed Commentary]]></description>
  <language>en-US</language>
  <copyright>Copyright 2026 The Narwhal News Society</copyright>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 04:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	    <item>
      <title>Pipeline Spills 290,000 Litres of Crude Oil Emulsion in Northern Alberta</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/pipeline-spills-290-000-litres-crude-oil-emulsion-northern-alberta/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/pipeline-spills-290-000-litres-crude-oil-emulsion-northern-alberta/</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 23:01:30 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[A pipeline owned by Paramount Resources Ltd. released an estimated 100,000 litres of crude oil and 190,000 litres of produced water near Zama City, in northwest Alberta, according to an April 11 incident report filed with the Alberta Energy Regulator. The release was discovered after company personnel looked into a low-pressure alarm from the company’s...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="826" height="490" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/zama-city-oil-spill-2.png" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/zama-city-oil-spill-2.png 826w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/zama-city-oil-spill-2-760x451.png 760w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/zama-city-oil-spill-2-450x267.png 450w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/zama-city-oil-spill-2-20x12.png 20w" sizes="(max-width: 826px) 100vw, 826px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption><hr></figure><p>A pipeline owned by Paramount Resources Ltd. released an estimated 100,000 litres of crude oil and 190,000 litres of produced water near Zama City, in northwest Alberta, according to an April 11 incident report filed with the <a href="http://www1.aer.ca/compliancedashboard/incidents.html" rel="noopener">Alberta Energy Regulator</a>.<p>The release was discovered after company personnel looked into a low-pressure alarm from the company&rsquo;s leak detection system, the incident report states. The emergency status of the spill ended April 16.</p><p>The report says that although &ldquo;the release was initially believed to be minor&rdquo; further investigation shows the spill to be around 290,000 litres and has impacted an area of 200 metres by 200 metres.</p><p>&ldquo;The pipeline was isolated and depressurized, and clean-up is underway,&rdquo; the incident report states. &ldquo;No reported impacts to wildlife.&rdquo;</p><p>The cause of the spill is still under investigation, Paul Wykes, spokesperson with Paramount Resources, told DeSmog Canada.</p><p><!--break--></p><p>The spill is located approximately 10 kilometres northeast of Zama City, Wykes said.</p><p>The remote pipeline is part of a network in the Zama area obtained by Paramount Resources when it acquired Apache Corp for $487 million in 2017.</p><p>Between May 2013 and January 2014 Apache&rsquo;s pipeline infrastructure was plagued by a <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/2013/12/02/third-apache-pipeline-leak-releases-additional-1-8-million-litres-produced-water-northern-alberta">series of incidents</a> that included one of the <a href="https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/apache-pipeline-leaks-60000-barrels-of-salty-water-in-northwest-alberta/article12494371/" rel="noopener">largest recent pipeline spills in North America</a>.</p><p>In June 2013, a pipeline released 15.4 million litres of oil and toxic produced water into muskeg, contaminating a 42-hectare span of boreal forest.</p><p><img src="/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Zama-aerial.jpg" alt=""></p><img src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Zama-aerial.jpg" alt="" width="720" height="450"><p>Apache pipeline spill, June&nbsp;2013. Photo: Apache Corp.</p><p>&ldquo;Every plant and tree died&rdquo; James Ahnassay, chief of the Dene Tha First Nation, told the Globe and Mail at the time.</p><p>The spill, which continued undetected for nearly one month, was originally reported to be only 9.5 million litres in volume due to an inaccurate meter reading, the company said.</p><p>Produced water can contain hydrocarbons, salt, metals, radioactive materials and chemicals uses in the oil extraction process.</p><p>An investigation later revealed the pipeline, which was only five years old at the time of the spill, cracked due to corrosion stress, caused by a pinhole leak. The company was later fined $16,500 for the spill and the Alberta Energy Regulator ordered a third-party audit of the company&rsquo;s aging pipeline infrastructure.</p><p>Oil and gas exploration has been occurring in the Zama area since the 1950s.</p><p>In October 2013, Apache announced it had detected another pipeline leak after it had released an estimated 1.8 million litres of oil, chemicals and contaminated water over a three-week period.</p><p>In a statement of facts agreed to by Apache concerning the 1.8 million litre spill, the company admitted it failed to install protective fencing around the pipeline and that evidence indicated a bison may have rubbed up against the pipe, crushing it.</p><p>Two additional Apache spills occurred between 2013 and 2014, one smaller spill near Zama and one near Whitecourt, Alberta, which released nearly 2 million litres of produced water.</p><p>It was later determined Apache failed to install proper pressure valves on the pipeline near Whitecourt.</p><p>In 2016 Apache pled guilty to violations of the Pipeline Act and the Environmental Enhancement and Protection Act as was fined $350,000 by the Alberta Energy Regulator. &nbsp;</p><p>In response to the April 11, 2018 spill, Paramount &ldquo;immediately initiated its emergency response plan,&rdquo; Wykes said.</p><p>&ldquo;A team of personnel is on site as containment, clean-up and delineation efforts continue. There is no danger to the public,&rdquo; he said.</p></p>
<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Linnitt]]></dc:creator>
			<category domain="post_cat"><![CDATA[News]]></category>			<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Apache Corp]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[News]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Paramount Resources]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[pipeline]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[produced water]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Zama City]]></category>    </item>
	    <item>
      <title>Third Apache Pipeline Leak Releases Additional 1.8 Million Litres of Produced Water in Northern Alberta</title>
      <link>https://thenarwhal.ca/third-apache-pipeline-leak-releases-additional-1-8-million-litres-produced-water-northern-alberta/?utm_source=rss</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost.com/narwhal/2013/12/02/third-apache-pipeline-leak-releases-additional-1-8-million-litres-produced-water-northern-alberta/</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 20:08:27 +0000</pubDate>			
			<description><![CDATA[A third leak recently discovered on Apache Canada&#8217;s property near Zama City in northwestern Alberta has released an estimated 1.8 million litres of wastewater onto 5 hectares of land, according to the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER). The spill was discovered on Friday, October 25th after an operator investigated a volume discrepancy at Apache&#8217;s Shekilie site,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="300" height="225" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/June-spill-site-aerial_Apache-Corp-300x225.jpg" class="attachment-banner size-banner wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/June-spill-site-aerial_Apache-Corp-300x225.jpg 300w, https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/June-spill-site-aerial_Apache-Corp-300x225-20x15.jpg 20w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption><small><em></em></small></figcaption><hr></figure><p>A third leak recently discovered on Apache Canada&rsquo;s property near Zama City in northwestern Alberta has released an estimated 1.8 million litres of wastewater onto 5 hectares of land, according to the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER).<p>The spill was discovered on Friday, October 25th after an operator investigated a volume discrepancy at Apache&rsquo;s Shekilie site, reports the <a href="http://norj.ca/2013/11/third-pipeline-leak-discovered-in-northern-alberta/" rel="noopener">Northern Journal</a>. The leak is believed to have begun on October 3rd, according to Apache.</p><p>The released water is a waste product of Apache&rsquo;s oil and gas operations in the area.&nbsp;Apache characterizes its&nbsp;<a href="http://www.apachecorp.com/Operations/Canada/Alberta/index.aspx" rel="noopener">operations</a>&nbsp;near Zama as using &ldquo;a novel enhanced oil recovery method to produce oil from what were once thought to be exhausted wells.&rdquo;</p><p>Reports of the release came just one week after Apache <a href="http://investor.apachecorp.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=798397" rel="noopener">announced</a> it had discerned the cause of a much larger incident that occurred in June, spilling 15.4 million litres of produced water in a 42-hectare area.&nbsp;</p><p><!--break--></p><p><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/Apache%20Spill_0.jpg-large"></p><p>Images of the June spill, released by the Dene Tha to&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/nvanderklippe/status/344964495497625600/photo/1" rel="noopener">Nathan Vanderklippe</a>, show the high-oil content of the release. According to the AER (formerly the ERCB) roughly 2000 litres of oil were released in the originally estimated 9.5 million gallon spill.&nbsp;</p><p>The spill, caused by a pipeline failure, released produced water into the surrounding forest for nearly one month &ndash; May 5th to June 1st &ndash; before it was detected. <a href="http://investor.apachecorp.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=798397" rel="noopener">According to Apache</a>, &ldquo;the failure of the less than five-year-old pipeline was caused by stress corrosion cracking.&rdquo;</p><p>&ldquo;Apache believes a pinhole in the exterior plastic liner allowed water to leak into the pipe, which mixed with sulphur gas, causing stress corrosion cracking and the sudden failure of the pipe.&rdquo;</p><p>Apache initially reported only 9.5 million litres were spilled, due to &ldquo;volumes&hellip;incorrectly allocated to another injection well.&rdquo;</p><p>A third and much smaller spill was also detected earlier this year.</p><p>According to the AER, the cause of the most recent spill remains unknown, although the pipeline &ldquo;is shut in a depressurized.&rdquo; Both the AER and Alberta&rsquo;s Environment and Sustainable Resource Development are present at the site.</p><p>The AER reports there are impacts to vegetation although no impacts to water bodies or wildlife have been reported. As of October 31st&nbsp;more than 600,000 litres of the spilled waste water had been recovered, reports the AER.&nbsp;</p><p><img alt="" src="https://thenarwhal.ca/wp-content/uploads/files/Apache%20Canadian%20Operations.jpg"></p></p>
<p><em><strong>The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/newsletter/?utm_source=rss">signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism</a>.</strong></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Linnitt]]></dc:creator>
						<category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Apache Canada]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[fracking]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[oil and gas]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[pipelines]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[produced water]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Spill]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[wastewater]]></category><category domain="post_tag"><![CDATA[Zama City]]></category>    </item>
	</channel>
</rss>