The Government of Alberta announced Tuesday it is beginning consultation on the emissions reduction system it hopes will replace the province’s existing carbon pricing for large emitters — but The Narwhal has learned no organizations working on environment or climate change issues have been included on the government’s list of stakeholders
Minister of Environment and Parks Jason Nixon said at a news conference that the government is now “seeking feedback on an improved way to manage emissions” — the province’s proposed Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction (TIER) system, which focuses on heavy emitters.
Nixon told reporters that government representatives will meet with approximately 150 stakeholders this week in Calgary, including representatives of the oil and gas, agriculture, chemicals, mining, forestry and electricity industries.
A list of the stakeholders obtained by The Narwhal does not include any public interest groups.
The Pembina Institute, a clean energy think tank started in Drayton Valley, Alta., in the 1980s, told The Narwhal it was not invited to participate in the consultations.
“It’s highly unusual,” Simon Dyer, executive director of the Pembina Institute, said in an interview.
Dyer said he heard first about the consultation in a news story following the government’s announcement.
“It’s a worrying signal about how this government is going to collect input from stakeholders,” he said.
Jess Sinclair, press secretary for Alberta Environment and Parks, told The Narwhal by email that “because the [emissions reduction] framework is designed with heavy industry in mind, we are beginning the consultation process focusing on affected industries.”
“That said, we are happy to engage with other interested parties in the spirit of collaboration, should they approach us and have relevant information to share.”
Sinclair provided The Narwhal with a list of “companies we’re currently consulting.” They include the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) and other industry associations, the so-called ‘Big Five’ oil giants and dozens of other companies. (The University of Alberta and the University of Calgary are both also included, as a result of their roles as producers of their own electricity).
Dyer is concerned that the government isn’t seeking out stakeholders who are specifically concerned about environmental impacts.
“It’s just appropriate when you’re developing regulations that will result in impacts on both company performance and greenhouse gas management that you should have stakeholders who are interested in environmental outcomes involved, to ensure those views are represented,” he said.
Pembina Institute part of previous consultations
Last week, Premier Jason Kenney announced he was allocating $2.5 million toward a public inquiry he said would “investigate the foreign-funded campaign to landlock our energy.”
“Alberta will no longer allow hostile interest groups to dictate our economic destiny as one of the most ethical major producers of energy in the world,” Kenney said when he announced the inquiry, and named the Pembina Institute as one of the inquiry’s potential targets.
But Dyer told The Narwhal he believes the Pembina Institute is well-positioned to provide perspectives on responsible energy development.
“As Canada’s leading clean energy think tank with core expertise in climate regulations for industry, we would hope they would reach out to us, but we’ve received nothing so far.”
Along with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), the Pembina Institute co-chaired technical consultation sessions on oil and gas regulations initiated by the previous government. In the past, industry has lauded the Pembina Institute’s work, including the work of Ed Whittingham, the group’s former executive director who became a target of the United Conservative Party during the recent election.
The new United Conservative Party (UCP) government, Dyer said, has been less willing to engage with environmental perspectives.
Trevor Tombe, an associate professor of economics at the University of Calgary, told The Narwhal by email that the nature of the consultation depends on the goal of the proposed changes.
“If the changes they actually have in mind are of a more technical nature, rather than fundamentally changing [the existing regulations], then limited engagement may be entirely appropriate.”
But, he added, it’s not yet known how extensive the UCP’s changes will be.
“The government has not been entirely clear around what their goals for reform actually are.”
Proposed system ‘applies specifically to industry’
Dyer said that not only has the Pembina Institute been shut out of consultations on the emissions reduction program, but every single request to meet with the new government has been rejected or ignored.
Sinclair, the press secretary for Alberta Environment and Parks, told The Narwhal by email “we are not currently engaging NGOs” when it comes to the proposed emissions reduction system.
“However, should a group like Pembina reach out with information relevant to the [emissions reduction] program, we are happy to engage with them.”
Nina Lothian, the director of the fossil fuels program at the Pembina Institute, sent a letter Wednesday to the government to request the group be included in future consultations.
“As experts in industrial carbon pricing and climate policy, the Pembina Institute would like to formally request inclusion in the engagement workshops on the proposed Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction (TIER) system,” she wrote.
“In the future, as is customary, we’d appreciate being included in discussions related to energy and environment issues from your department, and notification of important public policy announcements and proposals.”
Dyer told The Narwhal that the Pembina Institute has offered “to meet and to present our views and correct much of the extreme misinformation that’s on the record about our work.”
“Since the new government has come to Edmonton, we’ve reached out to the premier and we’ve reached out to his ministers, and every UCP MLA,” he said.
Not one, Dyer said, agreed to meet.
‘Somewhat ironic’ new rules
Nixon said at Tuesday’s news conference that Alberta’s provincial carbon tax was a “failed ideological experiment,” and his government plans to implement an improved system for emissions reduction.
Nixon made the announcement during a week of Calgary Stampede festivities. He was joined by Minister of Energy Sonya Savage and Minister of Agriculture and Forestry Devin Dreeshen.
The UCP government says it will replace the current system with its new emissions reduction proposal on Jan. 1, 2020.
The government bills the program as an “improved way to manage emissions from large industries like oil and gas.”
Others aren’t so sure.
Environmental groups have critiqued this type of policy approach and pointed to research that indicates a broadly and uniformly applied carbon pricing system is more likely to incentivize change — and spur innovation.
Tombe, the economics professor, told The Narwhal he’s “pleased to see the UCP support carbon taxes.”
“Though the coverage is narrower, it still covers 50 per cent of Alberta emissions with a price on emissions. This is a large departure from their political rhetoric,” he said.
Tombe remains skeptical of some parts of the plan, however. “It may propose to give larger subsidies to dirtier firms and smaller subsidies to cleaner ones,” he noted.
“This is unfortunate, and undermines some of the effectiveness of large-emitter climate policy in Alberta.”
Dyer is concerned it’s not necessary — or worth the effort — to “reinvent” emissions reduction regulations.
“The existing regulations drive innovation and they reward the cleanest operators,” Dyer said.
“It’s somewhat ironic that a week after the premier has said he’s concerned about negative attention on the oilsands, that Alberta would signal that it’s considering relaxing these rules in the long term.”
Dyer says strong emissions regulations increase the competitiveness of Alberta oil.
“We believe stronger regulations will help the industry compete and [help] Albertans’ communications efforts in the future about responsible oilsands development,” he said.
The public can provide online feedback on the government’s proposed emissions reduction system until Aug. 2, 2019.
And since you’re here, we have a favour to ask. Our independent, ad-free journalism is made possible because the people who value our work also support it (did we mention our stories are free for all to read, not just those who can afford to pay?).
As a non-profit, reader-funded news organization, our goal isn’t to sell advertising or to please corporate bigwigs — it’s to bring evidence-based news and analysis to the surface for all Canadians. And at a time when most news organizations have been laying off reporters, we’ve hired eight journalists over the past year.
Not only are we filling a void in environment coverage, but we’re also telling stories differently — by centring Indigenous voices, by building community and by doing it all as a people-powered, non-profit outlet supported by more than 2,500 members.
The truth is we wouldn’t be here without you. Every single one of you who reads and shares our articles is a crucial part of building a new model for Canadian journalism that puts people before profit.
We know that these days the world’s problems can feel a *touch* overwhelming. It’s easy to feel like what we do doesn’t make any difference, but becoming a member of The Narwhal is one small way you truly can make a difference.
We’ve drafted a plan to make 2021 our biggest year yet, but we need your support to make it all happen.
If you believe news organizations should report to their readers, not advertisers or shareholders, please become a monthly member of The Narwhal today for any amount you can afford.