News

CIBC Has No Data to Back Up $50m Loss Per Day Tar Sands Claim

By admin

April 4, 2013 1 min. read

A new paper put out yesterday by respected Canadian economist Robyn Allan, finds there is no existing data to back up the much-touted claim by CIBC energy analysts – and echoed by industry, government and major media outlets – that Canada is losing $50 million a day because it is selling tar sands crude "on the cheap."

In the paper, titled: Bitumen’s Deep Discount Deception And Canada’s Pipeline Mania: An Economic and Financial Analysis [PDF], Allan writes that the basis for the $50 million a day loss claim is a March 6, 2012 CIBC Institutional Equity Research Update published “Double Discounting of Canadian Crudes.” Google the phrase "double discounting Canada's crude" and "oil sands $50 million a day" and you will see how often these two phrases are being used to argue for further pipeline expansion in the form of the Keystone XL, Gateway and other proposed projects.

On Tuesday Joe Oliver, Canada's minister of natural resources, told reporters that:

"Because of a lack of pipeline capacity, Canadian oil is selling at a considerable discount to the international price. Some CAD $50 million every day is lost to the Canadian economy."

A Google search also shows that the CIBC report is not publicly available.

When Allan asked a CIBC analyst for the data backing the $50 million loss claim, the analyst told her, "I don't have that data anymore."

Without the data, Allan attempted to recreate the loss claim made by CIBC and concludes that, "on an annualized basis, and adjusting for natural differentials, we don’t need supply volumes to conclude there was no real loss posted to the oil industry for [synthetic crude oil] or for diluted bitumen as compared with [Western Texas Intermediate] in 2012."

In layman's terms Allan is saying the CIBC claim is incorrect and that in fact the $50 million figure is derived from a natural price differential that has always existed between the going market price for diluted tar sands bitumen (which Allan characterizes as "junk crude") and Western Texas Intermediate oil (WTI) which is a more valuable light crude oil.

Image Credit: Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline Brochure.

And since you’re here, we have a favour to ask. Our independent, ad-free journalism is made possible because the people who value our work also support it (did we mention our stories are free for all to read, not just those who can afford to pay?).

As a non-profit, reader-funded news organization, our goal isn’t to sell advertising or to please corporate bigwigs — it’s to bring evidence-based news and analysis to the surface for all Canadians. And at a time when most news organizations have been laying off reporters, we’ve hired five journalists over the past year.

Not only are we filling a void in environment coverage, but we’re also telling stories differently — by centring Indigenous voices, by building community and by doing it all as a people-powered, non-profit outlet supported by more than 3,500 members.

The truth is we wouldn’t be here without you. Every single one of you who reads and shares our articles is a crucial part of building a new model for Canadian journalism that puts people before profit.

We know that these days the world’s problems can feel a *touch* overwhelming. It’s easy to feel like what we do doesn’t make any difference, but becoming a member of The Narwhal is one small way you truly can make a difference.

If you believe news organizations should report to their readers, not advertisers or shareholders, please become a monthly member of The Narwhal today for any amount you can afford.