The B.C. government announced they will complete the Site C dam at a press conference Monday morning, revealing a new estimated cost of the project at $10.7 billion. The decision was made with the full approval of cabinet, reporters were told at a technical briefing at the B.C. Legislature.
“This has been a difficult decision,” Premier John Horgan said. “I’ve talked to many British Columbians and I can say this is a very divisive issue. We have not taken this decision lightly.”
The government said they took the British Columbia Utilities Commission review of the project into consideration as they made their final decision, finding project completion was a more favourable decision over termination when considered from a ratepayer perspective.
Criteria for the decision included ratepayer impacts, fiscal risk, First Nations rights, carbon emissions and agriculture/food security.
At an early morning press conference, Rob Botterell, counsel for the Peace Valley Landowners Association said, “the NDP Site C review process turned out to be a sham.”
“The era of decision making in backrooms is over; this is the 21st century.”
Botterell added that his clients are not planning to accept the decision without a fight.
“My clients will never surrender the Peace Valley over such a flawed process,” he said. “My clients will continue to use every tool within Canadian law to prevent Site C from proceeding.”
Other landowner groups also attended the press conference to express their disapproval.
“The government turned a deaf ear to the BCUC findings, and worked to undermine the independent regulator’s findings,” Dr. Steve Gray, Chair, Peace Valley Solidarity Initiative, said. “If this is a decision based on the need to take climate action, Site C is the most expensive and environmentally destructive way to get there.”
Green Party leader Andrew Weaver, the support of whose caucus is essential to keeping the NDP government in power, has expressed his disagreement with the decision. In a tweet, Weaver suggested that Energy and Mines minister Michelle Mungall should be recalled by her constituents.
Let’s have a look what our energy minister said about Site C on July 9, 2016: https://t.co/vdBo4hVs7i I would suggest a recall campaign in Nelson-Creston would be in order if Site C is approved on her watch as energy minister. #bcpoli
— Andrew Weaver (@AJWVictoriaBC) December 10, 2017
At the press conference, Horgan said he does not believe that disagreement will affect the long-term viability of the government. Horgan added that he does not believe he will lose members of his own caucus over the decision either.
In a follow up press briefing, BC Liberal MLA Mike Bernier for Peace River South stated, “It’s unfortunate we had to wait six months for what was the obvious choice.”
Bernier said the B.C. government considered information the BC Liberals had and realized the previous government had made the right decision regarding Site C.
Updates are coming. Follow our coverage here, and live on Twitter.
And since you’re here, we have a favour to ask. Our independent, ad-free journalism is made possible because the people who value our work also support it (did we mention our stories are free for all to read, not just those who can afford to pay?).
As a non-profit, reader-funded news organization, our goal isn’t to sell advertising or to please corporate bigwigs — it’s to bring evidence-based news and analysis to the surface for all Canadians. And at a time when most news organizations have been laying off reporters, we’ve hired eight journalists over the past year.
Not only are we filling a void in environment coverage, but we’re also telling stories differently — by centring Indigenous voices, by building community and by doing it all as a people-powered, non-profit outlet supported by more than 2,500 members.
The truth is we wouldn’t be here without you. Every single one of you who reads and shares our articles is a crucial part of building a new model for Canadian journalism that puts people before profit.
We know that these days the world’s problems can feel a *touch* overwhelming. It’s easy to feel like what we do doesn’t make any difference, but becoming a member of The Narwhal is one small way you truly can make a difference.
We’ve drafted a plan to make 2021 our biggest year yet, but we need your support to make it all happen.
If you believe news organizations should report to their readers, not advertisers or shareholders, please become a monthly member of The Narwhal today for any amount you can afford.