china-harper_0.jpeg

Harper Government Ratifies Controversial Canada-China Foreign Investment Deal

The Harper Government ratified the controversial Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) Friday after secretly signing the deal with China in Vladivostok, Russia in September 2012.

The Canadian public has been offered no opportunity to clarify the details of the agreement or discuss its economic or environmental implications even though FIPA is the most significant trade and investment deal in Canada’s history since NAFTA.

The Canada-China FIPA is a bilateral trade agreement intended to protect and promote international trade and foreign investment between nations through legally binding agreements.

Canada has 24 similar trade agreements with other nations including Russia, Argentina and the Czech Republic. The Canada-China FIPA has been widely criticized as lopsided, given China’s significant investment in Canada's economy and natural resources.

Critics expressed concern over FIPA after Prime Minister Stephen Harper approved the $15.1 billion acquisition of Canadian-owned Nexen Inc. by the Chinese National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC), a state-owned enterprise.

The presence of massive Chinese state-owned investments in Canada have led some to worry over the legal significance of FIPA.

Ed Fast, Minister of International Trade, said trade agreements like FIPA, "provide the protection and confidence Canadian investors need to expand, grow and succeed abroad," in a press statement released today.

“We remain committed to opening new markets around the world for Canadian companies, including in the fast-growing Asia-Pacific region. This FIPA will create jobs and economic opportunities for Canadians in every region of the country.”

Kai Nagata, energy and democracy director for the Dogwood Initiative, a democracy advocacy organization, said this treaty “takes decision-making power away from Canadian citizens, and puts the future of our economy in the hands of China's state-owned corporate behemoths."

“This has serious implications for our democracy, and that's why so many true conservatives are worried,” he said.

In 2012 Dogwood asked 7,000 Conservative donors to share their thoughts on the investment deal. According to Nagata 72 per cent said they would consider withdrawing financial support from the Harper Conservatives if the deal was ratified.

“Today marks a turning point,” Nagata said. “Harper has turned his back on Canadians, including the grassroots members of his own party, simply to save face with the regime in Beijing."

International investment lawyer and trade agreement expert Gus Van Harten told DeSmog Canada in 2012 the Canada-China FIPA essentially threatens Canadian sovereignty.

“What’s really different about the China-Canada investment deal,” he said, “is that it allows disputes about how laws and regulations or even court decisions have been made, to be decided outside of the Canadian courts.”

Under FIPA, disputes that have the potential to affect Chinese investment – whether they concern resource development, environmental law or the rights of Canadians citizens – will be resolved through international arbitration, without the knowledge or input of the Canadian public.

“The China-Canada investment deal and many of these other investment treaties…gives the power, and quite immense power, to the investor to challenge any decision that Canada would make, whether by the Canadian Parliament, or a provincial legislature, by the Supreme Court of Canada or a lower court, or by Cabinet or some low-level government official,” Van Harten said.

“Anything can be challenged by skipping Canadian courts and going straight to these international arbitrators.”

Because of this new legal obligation to protect Chinese investments, critics are worried the concerns of Chinese investors will take precedence over the rights of First Nations in local land and resource disputes, especially considering the presence of Chinese investment in Enbridge’s Northern Gateway pipeline.

The Hupacasath First Nation launched a legal battle against the agreement last June with the support of the Tsawwassen First Nation, the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs, the Serpent River First Nation in Ontario and the Chiefs of Ontario.

The Canadian federal court rejected the challenge in August 2013, saying the First Nation had not demonstrated the agreement would have adverse impacts on Aboriginal rights. Brenda Sayers, from the Hupacasath, told the CBC the federal government agreed to “hold off on the ratification until due process took place in court.”

Jamie Biggar, executive director with Leadnow, an independent advocacy organization that promotes participatory decision-making and democracy, told DeSmog Canada the agreement should not be permitted to threaten First Nations’ constitutional rights.

“Today Prime Minister Harper is showing his disrespect for the legal process by ratifying this agreement before the courts have finished reviewing the case,” Biggar said.

"A massive citizen response and the Hupacasath First Nation's legal challenge has delayed ratification of this secretive and extreme investor deal for two years longer than anyone thought possible,” he said.

“Tomorrow there will be a new wave of people working to hold this government accountable at the ballot box in 2015, and undo the damage that it's done."

New title

You’ve read all the way to the bottom of this article. That makes you some serious Narwhal material.

And since you’re here, we have a favour to ask. Our independent, ad-free journalism is made possible because the people who value our work also support it (did we mention our stories are free for all to read, not just those who can afford to pay?).

As a non-profit, reader-funded news organization, our goal isn’t to sell advertising or to please corporate bigwigs — it’s to bring evidence-based news and analysis to the surface for all Canadians. And at a time when most news organizations have been laying off reporters, we’ve hired five journalists over the past year.

Not only are we filling a void in environment coverage, but we’re also telling stories differently — by centring Indigenous voices, by building community and by doing it all as a people-powered, non-profit outlet supported by more than 3,300 members

The truth is we wouldn’t be here without you. Every single one of you who reads and shares our articles is a crucial part of building a new model for Canadian journalism that puts people before profit.

We know that these days the world’s problems can feel a *touch* overwhelming. It’s easy to feel like what we do doesn’t make any difference, but becoming a member of The Narwhal is one small way you truly can make a difference.

We’ve drafted a plan to make 2021 our biggest year yet, but we need your support to make it all happen.

If you believe news organizations should report to their readers, not advertisers or shareholders, please become a monthly member of The Narwhal today for any amount you can afford.

Finding the Mother Tree: ecologist Suzanne Simard offers solutions to B.C.’s forest woes

Everything in an ecosystem is connected. A tiny sapling relies on a towering ancient tree, just like a newborn baby depends on its mother. And...

Continue reading

Recent Posts

Help power our ad-free, non‑profit journalism
The Narwhal is coming to Ontario!

We’re on the verge of launching an Ontario bureau. Stay in the know by signing up for a weekly dose of our ad‑free, independent journalism.