When a Canadian federal-provincial environmental review panel ruled in 2007 that a proposed quarry would go against community core values and would threaten right whales and other marine life in the Bay of Fundy, groups that had fought against the project believed that was the end of the story.
But, that is not how the system works under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which has dispute settlement provisions allowing corporations to sue governments for compensation when they feel the local environmental approvals process has interfered with expected profits.
Instead of abandoning efforts to build a quarry and marine terminal on Digby Neck, Delaware-based Bilcon headed for the NAFTA Investor-State Dispute Settlement tribunal and, in 2015, the three-person panel ruled two-to-one that the environmental assessment panel had violated Canadian law by using the criterion of core community values.
Bilcon has claimed $300-$500 million in damages.
The Bilcon NAFTA ruling was inexplicable to Nova Scotia residents as the company planned to blast within 50 metres of the Bay of Fundy and build a 600 foot pier with nearly 50 45,000 tonne vessels a year carrying quarried basalt to the U.S. through waters that serves as a nursery for severely endangered right whales.
This week, the federal government and environmental organizations are in federal court arguing the NAFTA arbitration panel overstepped its bounds and, with NAFTA renegotiations underway, the case is being watched closely.
Ecojustice, working with Sierra Club Canada Foundation and East Coast Environmental Law, is arguing that Bilcon had the opportunity to ask a Canadian court to rule on the alleged breach of federal law, but, instead, went through NAFTA, which is supposed to decide only on questions of NAFTA law, meaning the tribunal stepped outside its legal expertise.
“If this decision stands it will send a chilling message that even when the Canadian government makes good decisions to protect our environment, there’s a chance that a NAFTA tribunal could swoop in, decide our environmental laws are unfair and force Canada to cough up hundreds of millions of dollars — leaving Canadian taxpayers on the hook,” Ecojustice said in a news release.
“We can’t let that happen.”
A local battle to protect a community and its environment “has turned into a broader fight to ensure international trade agreements do not supersede Canada’s environmental laws,” the release said.
The Bilcon case is under the legal microscope, but it is not the only case where Canada has been financially dinged after losing a NAFTA investor-state dispute.
The company is seeking $300 to $500 million in damages. https://t.co/8O8bRjNi4s
— DeSmog Canada (@DeSmogCanada) January 30, 2018
A report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives found that, as of January 1, 2018, Canada has paid out nearly $220 million in NAFTA losses and settlements — all to U.S. investors.
Those claims often targeted legitimate, non-discriminatory environmental protection, public health and resource management decisions made by Canadian governments, according to the report.
Canada currently faces eight claims with investors demanding about half a billion dollars, including Omnitrax’s claim relating to its broken rail line to Churchill, Manitoba and Lone Pine’s challenge to Quebec’s fracking moratorium, the report found.
In addition, the federal government has spent more than $95 million in legal fees defending the ballooning number of investor-state lawsuits.
The information was compiled by CCPA senior research fellow Scott Sinclair, through access to information requests, and Sinclair would like to see the federal government grasping the opportunity to remove the process from NAFTA — something suggested by the U.S.
But, instead, Canada’s position is to retain the dispute process as it helps Canadian resource companies investing in developing countries.
Since 2010, Canada has been sued twice as many times as Mexico and the U.S. combined, which is a worrying trend, Sinclair said.
“The Trudeau government has more than enough reasons to remove the undemocratic investor-state dispute settlement process from NAFTA during the current renegotiations, as proposed recently by the U.S. administration,” he said in a news release.
Canada could gain leverage by withdrawing its opposition to allowing countries to opt out of the process, Sinclair said.
“This could help negotiators advance other key Canadian interests, such as safeguarding affordable access to medicines or securing meaningful continental labour standards.”
And since you’re here, we have a favour to ask. Our independent, ad-free journalism is made possible because the people who value our work also support it (did we mention our stories are free for all to read, not just those who can afford to pay?).
As a non-profit, reader-funded news organization, our goal isn’t to sell advertising or to please corporate bigwigs — it’s to bring evidence-based news and analysis to the surface for all Canadians. And at a time when most news organizations have been laying off reporters, we’ve hired five journalists over the past year.
Not only are we filling a void in environment coverage, but we’re also telling stories differently — by centring Indigenous voices, by building community and by doing it all as a people-powered, non-profit outlet supported by more than 4,200 members.
The truth is we wouldn’t be here without you. Every single one of you who reads and shares our articles is a crucial part of building a new model for Canadian journalism that puts people before profit.
We know that these days the world’s problems can feel a *touch* overwhelming. It’s easy to feel like what we do doesn’t make any difference, but becoming a member of The Narwhal is one small way you truly can make a difference.
If you believe news organizations should report to their readers, not advertisers or shareholders, please become a monthly member of The Narwhal today for any amount you can afford.
The swollen creek, hurtling down a hillside toward Day Road on the Sunshine Coast, carves a path through the tarmac, chomps massive bites out of...Continue reading
A leak of the newest industry PR offensive reveals an effort to steer attention away...
People always tell us they love our newsletter. Find out yourself with a weekly dose of our ad‑free, independent journalism