A senior Alberta official found the renewables pause ‘very troubling.’ He was pressured to support it anyway
Internal emails show the head of the Alberta Electric System Operator was 'not comfortable' with...
This is a guest post by Heather Libby.
Earlier today, British Columbia Environment Minister Terry Lake gave notice that the provincial government officially objects to Enbridge’s application for the Northern Gateway pipeline.
The rejection is not entirely out-of-the-blue. Even before her surprising electoral win, Premier Christy Clark made it clear that Enbridge would need to meet 5 distinct conditions before she would consider giving the province’s blessing to the project, including marine and land oil spill prevention and respect for First Nations treaty rights (although later in the campaign, First Nations ‘treaty rights’ morphed into ‘economic benefits’).
In their official statement, the BC government made it clear that the steps taken by Enbridge to date were not enough to meet those conditions:
“British Columbia thoroughly reviewed all of the evidence and submissions made to the panel and asked substantive questions about the project, including its route, spill response capacity and financial structure to handle any incidents. Our questions were not satisfactorily answered during these hearings. …Our government does not believe that a certificate should be granted before these important questions are answered," said Minister Lake.
In a press scrum after the announcement, Federal Heritage Minister James Moore, the highest ranking Conservative in British Columbia, told CKNW980’s Shane Woodford that the Federal government agrees with BC’s five conditions, and acknowledges that public support is not behind the Enbridge project:
“We believe in waiting for the environmental assessment to come back and letting science drive this. As I said, the conditions the Premier has put forward, we agree with. These projects can't go forward without the public's support, and the public's support will never be behind these projects unless companies can demonstrate that they're being good stewards of the natural environment."
Moore’s answer, while cautious, is surprising.
Last year the federal Conservative government included legislative changes in its omnibus budget implementation bill, Bill-C38, that gave cabinet power to override the National Energy Board on decisions regarding pipeline approvals and to order alternative environmental assessment processes.
In non-governmentese, that means the Harper Conservatives could choose to overrule BC’s objections to the project and allow it anyway. Moore’s comments today and their emphasis on public support do not seem to support that option, particularly since only 35% of British Columbians support the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline project application.
Time will tell if Minister Moore is forced to retract or ‘clarify’ his comments.
A marine protected area managed by Kitasoo Xai’xais Nation has been designated a ‘blue park’ — an internationally recognized example of excellence in marine protection....
Continue readingInternal emails show the head of the Alberta Electric System Operator was 'not comfortable' with...
By May 8, shareholders must decide whether Enbridge should report emissions created when customers and...
Residents in the Greater Toronto Area had no idea a company operating in their community...