Vancouver Election Debate 20220907
Photo: The Canadian Press

What just happened with Vancouver’s heated debate on natural gas?

Gas heating, which represents more than half of Vancouver’s carbon pollution, was banned in new construction in 2020. A heated city council vote narrowly decided not to bring back gas
START – Apple News Only Block
Add content to the Apple News only block. You can add things like headings, paragraphs, images, galleries and audio clips. The content added here will not be visable on the website article

Get the inside scoop on The Narwhal’s environment and climate reporting by signing up for our free newsletter.

END – Apple News Only Block

An impassioned meeting unfolded in the chambers of Vancouver city hall this week, as councillors considered whether to allow gas-fired heating and hot water in new homes and buildings. Council heard from more than 100 residents who lined up to speak over two days, and the meeting was derailed at one point by a discussion of whether a display of children’s artwork was “intimidating” to gas supporters.

Natural gas for heating and hot water has been banned in new builds in the city since 2020. The ban followed council’s decision in July 2016 to adopt a zero-emissions building plan that gradually phased out natural gas for water and space heating.

But in July, a motion to reverse the ban was brought forward and Mayor Ken Sim cast the tie-breaking vote on a split council. 

The reversal, which surprised many Vancouver residents, was followed by a directive to city staff to report back to council with recommendations for building bylaw changes that would allow gas heating while still pursuing the city’s ambitious 2030 climate targets.

On Tuesday, a crowd gathered outside city hall to protest bringing back gas in new builds, while 142 people registered to speak to city council regarding the issue. Most speakers were heard the following day. Just after 8:00 p.m. on Wednesday, council voted on the recommendation to give builders the option to use natural gas. With one councillor absent, and one who changed her position and decided to oppose natural gas, the vote was tied 5-5 — which means natural gas heating won’t be back in Vancouver. 

Why was this motion so contentious? And what exactly is going on with natural gas in Vancouver? 

Why are people concerned about natural gas?

Natural gas is about 95 per cent methane, a greenhouse gas 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide. According to the City of Vancouver, heating buildings with natural gas is responsible for 55 per cent of the city’s carbon emissions — more than vehicle emissions

Vancouver’s climate emergency action plan, adopted in 2020, aims to reduce carbon emissions by 50 per cent by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. According to a July 2024 staff report, the city is not on track to meet these targets.

Natural gas has been linked to negative health outcomes. “Research indicates that Vancouver’s natural gas has disproportionately high levels of benzene, a known pollutant linked to various cancers, in North America — up to 50 times more than other cities,” Melissa Lem, president of the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, said in a statement following Wednesday’s vote. “Due to its toxicity, the World Health Organization suggests there are no safe exposure levels, and Health Canada has identified benzene as a priority for an updated human health risk assessment.”

Why did the City of Vancouver reverse the natural gas ban?

In a July press release, Sim said reversing the ban would help to address the crisis of unaffordable housing in Vancouver. “By allowing more energy options, we’re making it easier to build the homes we need while improving affordability for Vancouverites,” he said. 

Vancouver has the most expensive housing market of any Canadian city, with a current median price of more than $1.1 million. The median price for a detached home is more than $2 million.

But a city staff report released earlier this month noted allowing gas-fired heating and hot water in new builds was not expected to provide “any permitting advantage or construction cost savings.” Instead, the report noted “homeowners and landlords will be exposed to [the] risk of significant costs.” That’s because a provincial ban on the sale and installation of gas water heaters, new gas furnaces and gas boilers will take effect in 2030 and could cause homeowners to “incur costly retrofits.” 

What prompted Vancouver’s vote on natural gas heating?

After Vancouver council reversed the ban on natural gas heating in July, council still had to vote on whether to amend the bylaw to actually allow gas again.

City staff prepared a report with recommendations, which offered two compliance options for the building industry. The first did not permit gas for natural heating. The second provided an option for natural gas, while “managing carbon pollution” through building envelope requirements to improve energy efficiency through measures such as sealing leaks and adding insulation. (Both options permitted gas for cooking and gas fireplaces.) 

The report noted “buildings opting to use gas would have “significantly higher carbon emissions.”

What have the Vancouver mayor and councillors said about natural gas in the past?

Vancouver city council is dominated by the ABC Vancouver party, led by Sim and seven councillors. Councillors Adriane Carr and Pete Fry belong to the Green party, while Christine Boyle represented the One City Party. (Boyle, who was elected to the provincial legislature in October, is currently on leave from her role as a city councillor and has announced her intention to resign in December.)

In July, five ABC Vancouver councillors — Lenny Zhou, Mike Klassen, Brian Montague, Sarah Kirby-Yung and Rebecca Bligh — voted to bring back gas. ABC Vancouver councillors Lisa Dominato and Peter Meiszner voted to keep gas banned, along with Carr, Fry and Boyle. Sim, who was on vacation at the time and absent for the other agenda items, joined the meeting by Zoom to cast his tie-breaking vote before exiting for the remainder of the meeting.

Critics of gas use in new builds alleged some members of Vancouver city council appear to have ties to the gas industry. As previously reported in the Vancouver Sun, the ABC’s Montague, who spearheaded the motion to bring back gas, and Klassen, who supported it, met with a FortisBC lobbyist in December 2023. Klassen disclosed a financial interest in the company as well as in pipeline company TC Energy. And Sim’s senior advisor, David Grewal, is a director for two natural gas companies; he is listed as the co-founder of one, and the primary contact for the other.

Investigating problems. Exploring solutions
The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by signing up for a weekly dose of independent journalism.
Investigating problems. Exploring solutions
The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by signing up for a weekly dose of independent journalism.

Why did the Vancouver city council meeting get so heated on the topic of natural gas?

Hours into the discussion, Montague paused to question whether the signs made by children should be allowed in the council chamber. “I see councillor Fry and councillor Carr have signs on their desks, and I feel that’s intimidating to the speakers that we’re going to have,” Montague said. “I feel it’s intimidation, and they’re basically saying they don’t want to hear them. So I’m asking the chair to determine if this is a breach of policy, and if they should take down the signs.” 

The signs in question were colourful artwork created by children and brought to city hall by For Our Kids, a parent-led network” dedicated to climate action, which urged councillors to uphold the ban. 

Following a short recess, Sim addressed the councillors and those assembled. “That’s something we won’t tolerate,” he said. “I know how hard it is for people to come here — there’s a fear of speaking, it’s nerve-wracking and if there’s an opinion expressed that may not be aligned with councillors in this chamber — or the mayor — it’s intimidating at the best of times.” Sim agreed the signs should come down. “You made your point, you got your shot in the media. Now let’s make this chamber a safe space for everyone who wants to make their voice heard.” 

Dominato, who attended by Zoom, asked for clarification: “Is that not artwork that was brought to city hall today by children, representing children?”

Sim suggested the age of the sign artists wasn’t relevant. “You could make an extreme case, where a kid brought in a sign that was completely inappropriate,” he said.

One sign on Fry’s desk featured a smiling whale, with “iris orca ” written in capital letters.

“It very clearly expresses an opinion as to where people stand on this issue,” Sim replied.

What are other cities doing about natural gas?

The charge to electrify buildings started in Berkeley, Calif., which instituted the first North American ban on natural gas connections for new buildings in 2019.

In 2020, Vancouver became the first Canadian city to implement natural gas restrictions.. Victoria introduced a similar gas heating ban to its building codes in 2022. 

Montreal’s ban on natural gas heat in new low-rise buildings came into effect in October and will extend to all new buildings by 2025. Nanaimo, B.C., placed restrictions on gas as a primary heat source for new homes this summer, while Prévost, Que. — population 12,000 — approved a gas ban in new and existing buildings last fall. In Winnipeg, a proposal to phase out natural gas has stalled.

Several U.S. states, including New York, Maryland and Washington, have also proposed some form of restriction on natural gas use in buildings, as have more than 100 American cities.

How did council vote on the recommendation to restore natural gas?

The first recommendation, which set guidelines for builders that excluded the use of natural gas for heating — passed with six votes in favour. Sim and councillors Montague, Klassen and Zhou were opposed.

The second recommendation, which would allow builders to use natural gas for heating and hot water, resulted in a split vote. Those who voted against the reversal in July held their positions. Sim suggested Vancouver’s position on natural gas wouldn’t matter in the global scheme of climate change, saying it might alleviate housing unaffordability — although he acknowledged the city staff report suggested the measures would not improve affordability.

Bligh, who voted for the reversal in July, said she changed her position after speaking with experts and builders who told her they could build just as quickly and economically with electric heating. “I believe we made the wrong decision,” she said, referring to the July vote. She added she had heard from citizens concerned about climate change. “Young people were disappointed and let down by the vote in July,” Bligh said. “They saw what I see now.”

Without Bligh’s support, the vote was split 5-5 in Boyle’s absence. A tie vote, under Robert’s rules of order, meant the option to allow natural gas heating failed.

— With files from Julia-Simone Rutgers

Like a kid in a candy store
When those boxes of heavily redacted documents start to pile in, reporters at The Narwhal waste no time in looking for kernels of news that matter the most. Just ask our Prairies reporter Drew Anderson, who gleefully scanned through freedom of information files like a kid in a candy store, leading to pretty damning revelations in Alberta. Long story short: the government wasn’t being forthright when it claimed its pause on new renewable energy projects wasn’t political. Just like that, our small team was again leading the charge on a pretty big story

In an oil-rich province like Alberta, that kind of reporting is crucial. But look at our investigative work on TC Energy’s Coastal GasLink pipeline to the west, or our Greenbelt reporting out in Ontario. They all highlight one thing: those with power over our shared natural world don’t want you to know how — or why — they call the shots. And we try to disrupt that.

Our journalism is powered by people just like you. We never take corporate ad dollars, or put this public-interest information behind a paywall. Will you join the pod of Narwhals that make a difference by helping us uncover some of the most important stories of our time?
Like a kid in a candy store
When those boxes of heavily redacted documents start to pile in, reporters at The Narwhal waste no time in looking for kernels of news that matter the most. Just ask our Prairies reporter Drew Anderson, who gleefully scanned through freedom of information files like a kid in a candy store, leading to pretty damning revelations in Alberta. Long story short: the government wasn’t being forthright when it claimed its pause on new renewable energy projects wasn’t political. Just like that, our small team was again leading the charge on a pretty big story

In an oil-rich province like Alberta, that kind of reporting is crucial. But look at our investigative work on TC Energy’s Coastal GasLink pipeline to the west, or our Greenbelt reporting out in Ontario. They all highlight one thing: those with power over our shared natural world don’t want you to know how — or why — they call the shots. And we try to disrupt that.

Our journalism is powered by people just like you. We never take corporate ad dollars, or put this public-interest information behind a paywall. Will you join the pod of Narwhals that make a difference by helping us uncover some of the most important stories of our time?

PRGT pipeline decision looms large for B.C.’s new environment minister 

As members of B.C. Premier David Eby’s new cabinet headed to their swearing-in ceremony on Nov. 18, they were greeted by about two dozen people...

Continue reading

Recent Posts

Our newsletter subscribers are the first to find out when we break a big story. Sign up for free →
An illustration, in yellow, of a computer, with an open envelope inside it with letter reading 'Breaking news.'
Will you swim against the consumer current this week? We need to add 200 more members to meet our 2024 goal — and if you join by midnight Friday we’ll send you a Narwhal toque to say thanks!
Every new member between now and midnight Friday will have their contributions doubled by two generous donors.
Let’s match
Every new member between now and midnight Friday will have their contributions doubled by two generous donors.
Let’s match
Will you swim against the consumer current this week? We need to add 200 more members to meet our 2024 goal — and if you join by midnight Friday we’ll send you a Narwhal toque to say thanks!