slactivism.jpg

Why ‘Slacktivism’ Matters

This is a guest post by Tania Lown-Hecht from the Outdoor Alliance.

In the last decade, social media has transformed how people relate to each other and the rest of the world. For people who experienced their adolescence before the Internet, this digital world can sometimes seem like a simulacrum of the “real thing.” Most of us have heard complaints about “slacktivism” on our social media feeds, the phenomenon where people post about advocacy issues they care about on social media.

Critics of slacktivism believe that social media posts amount to little more than making the poster feel briefly good about him or herself. While I initially bristled at the idea that social media advocacy could be effective, over the past year I’ve fallen in line with my millennial brethren. Here are five pieces of evidence that “slacktivism” is anything but slacking — and that we should all be using this low-investment, high-yield form of engagement to get what we want from policymakers.

  1. Policymakers use Facebook and Twitter as an index for deciding what issues to work on. Contrary to some people's beliefs, posts on Facebook actually do influence the democratic process. Some definitive proof? At the first U.S. Democratic debate, the moderator cited Facebook status updates, rather than polling, to describe what issues were relevant to constituents.
     
  2. Just a few social media comments make an outsized impact on a legislator. Traditional forms of individual advocacy might include letter writing or calling your representative’s office. While these are still useful, there is new evidence that social media comments — both on a legislator’s page and on important topics — have even more impact than these traditional approaches. A recent report noted that just 30 comments on a social media post would be enough to get a policymaker’s attention.
     
  3. Some of the most successful recent advocacy campaigns have been social media based. From the ice bucket challenge to the Human Rights Coalition’s profile picture takeover to the (infamous) Joseph Kony videos, social media is is a powerful breeding ground for activism that can have enormous, wide-reaching and powerful impacts.
     
  4. Social media keeps you (and your representative) informed. With the barrage of information that we all face on a daily basis, social media has become a way for people to keep on top of major issues. Policymakers reportedly believe that the Internet has made it easier for people to engage on public policy and that they have to be more responsive to their constituents because of their engagement.
     
  5. Slacktivism is a gateway drug for more advocacy. Studies show that if you are willing to use your social media networks to promote a cause or issue, you’re more likely to volunteer and participate, and to donate or solicit donations from others, with the result that you are on average nearly twice as engaged as the average American.

The takeaways? Social media is one of the best ways to stay informed — and keep your community informed about issues that matter. Writing or responding to a policymaker on Twitter or Facebook has a huge impact. Sharing a story about public lands, wildfires or climate change does not go unnoticed. And, most importantly, discussing issues online or in person are the pre-cursor to citizens getting more involved on issues that matter — and that’s what it’s all about.

P.S. Find Outdoor Alliance on Twitter and Facebook to stay up to date with advocacy opportunities, public lands mayhem, and our secret desire to tour the country in a remodeled Airstream.

Image: Staya via Flickr

Another year of keeping a close watch
Here at The Narwhal, we don’t use profit, awards or pageviews to measure success. The thing that matters most is real-world impact — evidence that our reporting influenced citizens to hold power to account and pushed policymakers to do better.

And in 2024, our stories were raised in parliaments across the country and cited by citizens in their petitions and letters to politicians.

In Alberta, our reporting revealed Premier Danielle Smith made false statements about the controversial renewables pause. In Manitoba, we proved that officials failed to formally inspect a leaky pipeline for years. And our investigations on a leaked recording of TC Energy executives were called “the most important Canadian political story of the year.”

As the year draws to a close, we’d like to thank you for paying attention. And if you’re able to donate anything at all to help us keep doing this work in 2025 — which will bring a whole lot we can’t predict — thank you so very much.

Will you help us hold the powerful accountable in the year to come by giving what you can today?
Another year of keeping a close watch
Here at The Narwhal, we don’t use profit, awards or pageviews to measure success. The thing that matters most is real-world impact — evidence that our reporting influenced citizens to hold power to account and pushed policymakers to do better.

And in 2024, our stories were raised in parliaments across the country and cited by citizens in their petitions and letters to politicians.

In Alberta, our reporting revealed Premier Danielle Smith made false statements about the controversial renewables pause. In Manitoba, we proved that officials failed to formally inspect a leaky pipeline for years. And our investigations on a leaked recording of TC Energy executives were called “the most important Canadian political story of the year.”

As the year draws to a close, we’d like to thank you for paying attention. And if you’re able to donate anything at all to help us keep doing this work in 2025 — which will bring a whole lot we can’t predict — thank you so very much.

Will you help us hold the powerful accountable in the year to come by giving what you can today?

Musician Corb Lund on Alberta coal mines: ‘they’re going to ruin our ground water’ 

Much ink has been spilled over research from the University of Alberta that asked focus groups to “draw an Albertan.” Overwhelmingly, participants drew a man...

Continue reading

Recent Posts

Our newsletter subscribers are the first to find out when we break a big story. Sign up for free →
An illustration, in yellow, of a computer, with an open envelope inside it with letter reading 'Breaking news.'
Cartoon title: Risks of reading The Narwhal. Illustration of a woman sitting with a computer that has a Narwhal sticker on a park bench. A narwhal sitting next to her reads her computer screen over the shoulder. Text reads: "Wait — the government did WHAT?"
More than 800 readers have already stepped up in December to support our investigative journalism. Will you help us break big stories in 2025 by making a donation this holiday season?
Every new member between now and midnight Friday will have their contributions doubled by two generous donors.
Let’s match
Every new member between now and midnight Friday will have their contributions doubled by two generous donors.
Let’s match
Cartoon title: Risks of reading The Narwhal. Illustration of a woman sitting with a computer that has a Narwhal sticker on a park bench. A narwhal sitting next to her reads her computer screen over the shoulder. Text reads: "Wait — the government did WHAT?"
More than 800 readers have already stepped up in December to support our investigative journalism. Will you help us break big stories in 2025 by making a donation this holiday season?