Families forced to evacuate their homes in Peace River, Alberta due to toxic fumes from bitumen development have finally received official recognition of their plight.
This week an Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) panel released a report confirming the odours released from a Baytex Energy Corp. oilsands processing facility may have been the cause of health complications, including chronic coughing, disorientation, nose and throat irritation, fatigue, weight loss, gray skin, and the formation of growths, that forced the families from their properties.
Oilsands deposits in the Peace River region are extracted using a relatively new method called Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand or CHOPS. The process involves pumping heavy oil from the ground to heated surface-level tanks that produce emissions plumes.
“The Panel’s main finding in this section is that odours from heavy oil operations in the Peace River area have the potential to cause some of the symptoms experienced by residents; therefore, these odours should be eliminated,” the report states.
The panel also noted a lack of clear communication concerning air monitoring to local community members.
Residents of the Peace River area have raised concerns regarding the fumes for nearly three decades but became more suspicious of the link to health complications in recent years and most notably after Baytex drilled new wells in 2011. The Alberta government does not monitor the Peace River region's air for anything but sour gas and sulphur dioxide and has previously claimed there is no scientific evidence to connect the Baytex emissions to the community’s symptoms.
In March of 2013 Alberta Energy Minister Ken Hughes visited the region and subsequently turned down Baytex’s application to add new drill sites.
“What I could detect was that there was something in the air that was different than the rest of Alberta,” Hughes said. “This kind of development was experiencing different emissions, and different air quality problems.”
As outlined in the recent AER report, Baytex now has four months to install pollution-control devices on its tanks. The report also calls for further studies into the connection between oil emissions and negative health impacts and recommends Alberta Health “ensure[s] that appropriate avenues exist to link local physicians with specialists in environmental health.”
During a recent AER public hearing in the area medical doctors admitted they hesitated to voice their suspicions about the fumes because of the potential consequences of appearing critical of industry. Some doctors refused to provide care for residents claiming their medical problems were directly related to the emissions.
Resident Karla Lebrecque told the panel her doctor called a local politician before agreeing to perform a blood test.
In an open letter to Baytex Energy Labrecque wrote “I am not a tree hugger, environmental activist or anti-oil activist. Quite the opposite; I fully appreciate the prosperity that our region has experienced thanks in no small part to Alberta’s thriving oil and gas industry.”
She added, “while I believe that Alberta is rightfully an energy superpower, I’m also a mother tired of my family being poisoned by Baytex Energy’s emissions and the Alberta Government allowing them to do so. I also believe it is possible for Baytex Energy to extract oil from the ground responsibly while simultaneously growing their company and that the same time protecting the health of those that live near and around their sites.”
Greenpeace climate and energy campaigner Mike Hudema says what’s happening in the Peace River region highlights the uncertainties surrounding the extraction and processing of bitumen.
The “troubling thing the report showed was that the government has a huge information gap when it comes to the impacts of tar sands development. The report shows that tar sands impacts will be different given differences in things like geology and wind patterns and regulations should, but don’t, currently reflect that. It also shows that, once again, Alberta’s monitoring system is inadequate,” he wrote.
Image Credit: StopBaytex.ca
And since you’re here, we have a favour to ask. Our independent, ad-free journalism is made possible because the people who value our work also support it (did we mention our stories are free for all to read, not just those who can afford to pay?).
As a non-profit, reader-funded news organization, our goal isn’t to sell advertising or to please corporate bigwigs — it’s to bring evidence-based news and analysis to the surface for all Canadians. And at a time when most news organizations have been laying off reporters, we’ve hired five journalists over the past year.
Not only are we filling a void in environment coverage, but we’re also telling stories differently — by centring Indigenous voices, by building community and by doing it all as a people-powered, non-profit outlet supported by more than 3,500 members.
The truth is we wouldn’t be here without you. Every single one of you who reads and shares our articles is a crucial part of building a new model for Canadian journalism that puts people before profit.
We know that these days the world’s problems can feel a *touch* overwhelming. It’s easy to feel like what we do doesn’t make any difference, but becoming a member of The Narwhal is one small way you truly can make a difference.
If you believe news organizations should report to their readers, not advertisers or shareholders, please become a monthly member of The Narwhal today for any amount you can afford.
A dense fog rolls in from the ocean on a cool, wet summer morning in Gaw Old Masset, a small village at the north end...Continue reading
Recent report finds no evidence train started wildfire, exonerating CP and CN
After TC Energy cleared an archaeological site, armed with permits issued by the province, Gidimt’en...
People always tell us they love our newsletter. Find out yourself with a weekly dose of our ad‑free, independent journalism