Glyphosate__Inset3_Final
Illustration: Alex Boersma / The Narwhal

Glyphosate use in B.C. forestry, explained

Aspen is a natural fire guard — and a frequent target of industrial herbicides. In B.C., over 1 million hectares of forests have been sprayed
START – Apple News Only Block
Add content to the Apple News only block. You can add things like headings, paragraphs, images, galleries and audio clips. The content added here will not be visable on the website article

Get the inside scoop on The Narwhal’s environment and climate reporting by signing up for our free newsletter.

END – Apple News Only Block

For decades, forestry companies in B.C. have used glyphosate and other herbicides to kill off trembling aspen, a deciduous tree the industry and the provincial government view as unwanted competition for conifers destined to become timber.

The BC NDP, which returned to government with a slim majority in October, committed to phase out the controversial use of glyphosate in forestry during the provincial election campaign.

While ecologists and advocates welcome the promise, they warn it’s not just the herbicide that needs to go — it’s also B.C.’s broader policies that prioritize timber over diverse ecosystems.

After years of destructive wildfires, more and more people are recognizing the value of aspen and other deciduous trees.

In the summer, when aspens are lush and green, they act like a sponge, holding moisture from the forest floor in their bark and leaves. Conifers, by contrast, are drier, and their needles packed full of flammable resin. Conifers spur on fire, but aspens can slow it down.

As the provincial government considers its next steps, here are a few things you need to know about the use of herbicides in forestry — and the consequences of killing off aspen.

More than one million hectares of B.C. forest have been sprayed with herbicides

B.C. government regulations require companies to prioritize conifer growth over deciduous trees like aspen — and those that don’t risk fines for failing to meet certain milestones.

In many areas across B.C., companies manually cut back plants that might compete with conifers for water, nutrients and sunlight. But herbicides are often a less expensive option, according to a 2019 review of the industry’s use of glyphosate by FPInnovations, a non-profit focused on research and development in the forestry sector.

An illustration of a helicopter flying across a young forest spraying herbicides
Government data shows more than one million hectares of forest have been sprayed with glyphosate to kill off any plants that might compete with conifer crops. Illustration: Alex Boersma / The Narwhal

Glyphosate, which the World Health Organization says is probably carcinogenic to people, is the main component in the popular herbicide RoundUp. Plants absorb the chemical, which blocks them from taking in nutrients from the soil, through their leaves. As the plant starves, its colour fades, its leaves shrivel and then it dies.

Since the 1970s, more than one million hectares of forest in B.C. have been sprayed with herbicides — either by helicopter or on the ground using methods such as backpack sprayers. 

Glyphosate use in forestry is in decline — but its ‘huge impacts’ persist

Spraying ramped up in the 1980s, according to government data analyzed for The Narwhal by Nikita Wallia, a spatial analyst and cartography specialist. 

In an emailed statement to The Narwhal, a spokesperson for B.C.’s Ministry of Forests said the use of herbicides in forestry has declined by 88 per cent since 2018, adding, “the province works with foresters to grow trees without glyphosate.”

But even as the practice becomes less common, the consequences of decades of glyphosate spraying are still visible in forests today, according to James Steidle, founder of Stop the Spray B.C., a group advocating for an end to glyphosate spraying. While Steidle says manually cutting back deciduous trees is better than spraying herbicides, he warns it can still have “huge impacts” on aspen communities and on forest biodiversity.

B.C. government data shows herbicides have been sprayed across more than one million hectares of forest since the 1970s to control plants that industry and the Forests Ministry view as competition for conifers destined to become timber. Companies have also manually cut back aspen, berries and other plants across roughly 1.5 million hectares of the province. Map: Nikita Wallia / The Narwhal

Herbicides target wildfire-resistant trees, food for moose, deer and bears 

The Narwhal reviewed more than 2,000 pages of herbicide reports forestry companies submitted to the B.C. government, received in response to a freedom of information request. Those reports show companies are targeting a host of species with herbicide treatments, from aspen and cottonwood to willows and rose.

Many plants the industry targets provide food not just for deer, moose, bears and birds but also for people, who harvest berries and medicinal plants from the land. Mixed forests, made up of diverse species, have been found to be more resistant to pests and disease. Aspen, maples, poplars and other deciduous trees return nutrients to the soil when their leaves fall each autumn.

Aspens play an important role wherever they’re found. Beavers prefer aspen trunks and twigs to build their dams. Birds nest in their cavities. Moose, deer and black bears eat their leaves. And, during the height of wildfire seasons, groves of moist aspens can serve as a natural break. But those benefits are eroded or lost entirely when aspen are culled from forests where timber production is prioritized.

Investigating problems. Exploring solutions
The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by signing up for a weekly dose of independent journalism.
Investigating problems. Exploring solutions
The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by signing up for a weekly dose of independent journalism.

Herbicides can change the way wildfires spread across the landscape

Wildland fire ecologist Robert Gray says herbicide use can change potential fire behaviour. In the short-term, it creates fuel for fires as sprayed plants dry out and die. The brush will eventually decompose, but a natural fire break is lost in areas where aspen and other deciduous trees are killed off.

“We talk about mature aspen as wet blankets or speed bumps on the landscape,” Gray says.

There are some caveats. Aspens dry out in the winter, so they are more resistant to fire when their leaves unfold from their buds each spring and they start to retain moisture. Even then, Gray says, groves of almost entirely deciduous trees — such as aspen, alder or birch — are needed to reap those fuel break benefits. And the trees must be tall enough and dense enough for their leafy canopies to close, shading the forest floor and trapping moisture in the soils and foliage below.

“We’re going to have to embrace hardwoods as part of the solution to the fire problem,” Gray says. “Moving away from herbicides specifically to kill aspen is the first step.”

The Yukon is embracing aspens as a fire guard — ecologists say B.C. should too

The Yukon government is clearing conifers from a 20-kilometre stretch of forest to protect the city of Whitehorse from a potentially catastrophic wildfire. Expanses of white spruce and lodgepole pine are being cleared to make way for aspen.

To some degree, the territorial government is attempting to emulate a transformation that would naturally be triggered by fire, Luc Bibeau, the manager of prevention and mitigation with Yukon Wildland Fire Management, says. In many areas, aspens are one of the first species to naturally regenerate after fire or other disturbances. Eventually, those aspen groves transition to forests dominated by conifers. Then fire sweeps through and the cycle begins again.

a person and dog in an area of burned aspen trees
When fires move through aspen groves, they tend to be less intense, burning along the ground and not through the treetops — exactly the kind of fire that firefighters in Canada are effective at catching, Luc Bibeau explains. Photo: Supplied by James Steidle

But in many places across Canada, fires have been aggressively suppressed for decades, simultaneously suppressing the natural renewal of aspen forests.

“There hasn’t been a major wildfire in the area south of Whitehorse since somewhere around 1908,” Bibeau notes. 

Today, the dense forests of spruce and pine around the northern city are primed to burn. The Whitehorse fire break, which is as wide as two kilometres in some areas, is meant to reduce the risk and give firefighters a better chance to respond in the event of a major blaze.

In B.C., Gray says the provincial government should move away from its “active war on hardwoods” like aspen in tandem with its plans to phase out glyphosate.

“We need a lot more not only aspen on the landscape, but shrub communities and grasslands — and that’s going to happen anyway with the kind of fires we’re having, we just should be helping it along,” he says.

Another year of keeping a close watch
Here at The Narwhal, we don’t use profit, awards or pageviews to measure success. The thing that matters most is real-world impact — evidence that our reporting influenced citizens to hold power to account and pushed policymakers to do better.

And in 2024, our stories were raised in parliaments across the country and cited by citizens in their petitions and letters to politicians.

In Alberta, our reporting revealed Premier Danielle Smith made false statements about the controversial  renewables pause. In Manitoba, we proved that officials failed to formally inspect a leaky pipeline for years. And our investigations on a leaked recording of TC Energy executives were called “the most important Canadian political story of the year.”

As the year draws to a close, we’d like to thank you for paying attention. And if you’re able to donate anything at all to help us keep doing this work in 2025 — which will bring a whole lot we can’t predict — thank you so very much.

Will you help us hold the powerful accountable in the year to come by giving what you can today?
Another year of keeping a close watch
Here at The Narwhal, we don’t use profit, awards or pageviews to measure success. The thing that matters most is real-world impact — evidence that our reporting influenced citizens to hold power to account and pushed policymakers to do better.

And in 2024, our stories were raised in parliaments across the country and cited by citizens in their petitions and letters to politicians.

In Alberta, our reporting revealed Premier Danielle Smith made false statements about the controversial  renewables pause. In Manitoba, we proved that officials failed to formally inspect a leaky pipeline for years. And our investigations on a leaked recording of TC Energy executives were called “the most important Canadian political story of the year.”

As the year draws to a close, we’d like to thank you for paying attention. And if you’re able to donate anything at all to help us keep doing this work in 2025 — which will bring a whole lot we can’t predict — thank you so very much.

Will you help us hold the powerful accountable in the year to come by giving what you can today?

16 oilsands companies allegedly broke environmental rules. Alberta kept it a secret for 3 years

Get the inside scoop on The Narwhal’s environment and climate reporting by signing up for our free newsletter. At least 16 fossil fuel companies operating...

Continue reading

Recent Posts

Our newsletter subscribers are the first to find out when we break a big story. Sign up for free →
An illustration, in yellow, of a computer, with an open envelope inside it with letter reading 'Breaking news.'
That’s right — all donations are being doubled until Dec. 31. The Narwhal’s independent journalism is made possible by readers just like you who give what they can. Will you help us break big investigations in 2025?
A "2X" or "two times" graphic.
Every new member between now and midnight Friday will have their contributions doubled by two generous donors.
Let’s match
Every new member between now and midnight Friday will have their contributions doubled by two generous donors.
Let’s match
That’s right — all donations are being doubled until Dec. 31. The Narwhal’s independent journalism is made possible by readers just like you who give what they can. Will you help us break big investigations in 2025?
A "2X" or "two times" graphic.