4-22-13-Joint-Oilsands-Monitoring-Portal.jpg

Canada-Alberta Oilsands Monitoring Portal Online, Environmental Groups Skeptical

After several months of delay, the federal and Alberta governments have finally followed through on their promise to release tar sands monitoring data to the general public. The Canada-Alberta Oil Sands Environmental Monitoring Information Portal came online Monday in time for Earth Day.

The portal aims to provide information on air, water, wildlife contaminants and biodiversity. It includes an interactive map with links to monitoring activities all over the province. The site will use satellite measurements to estimate emissions of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide but it will not provide data on carbon emissions. 

Environment Minister Peter Kent touted the website’s launch as evidence that Canada is contributing and doing its part to protect the environment.

“With this portal, our respective governments are actively encouraging informed discussions and analysis on the impacts of oil sands development based on high-quality scientific information.”

While University of Alberta ecologist David Schindler told CBC news he was on board with the move, Keith Stewart, climate and energy campaign coordinator for Greenpeace Canada was less optimistic. "We're a little skeptical, as the system won't be fully implemented until 2015 and yet the two levels of government continue to approve new projects in the absence of reliable data on cumulative impacts," he said.

Indeed, many of the sections promise data that “will be released in the coming months.” 

“The section on biodiversity is focused on more monitoring to determine the problems, when it is already well known what the problems are,” Helene Walsh, boreal program director at the Northern Alberta chapter of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) said via e-mail.

She pointed to a 2009 report that found without “immediate and sufficient action” the boreal caribou would be gone from the landscape within two to four decades.

“Except for recent protection of small portions of two caribou ranges, nothing has been done to meet the needs of caribou in the oil sands region,” she said. “This is an excellent example of monitoring that has been well done, but then no action taken to deal with the results because any meaningful action would require a restriction on oil sands development to protect and/or restore habitat.  Alberta does not ‘balance’ economic with environmental as they would like people to believe.”

She says that as petroleum production in Alberta has risen there has been a corresponding decrease in the caribou population. 

Edmonton-based Greenpeace climate campaigner Mike Hudema told the Vancouver Observer that, although “good data is better than bad data, there is still little plan to act on the data.”

“There is no indication of when, or even if, this will become a truly independent monitoring regime as recommended by the federal government’s scientific panel," he said.

CBC newsreaders also expressed misgivings as to whether the information the portal presents is being accurately interpreted. Statements such as the following from the site’s introduction show a notably reassuring tone in its assessments:

“To date, the results of environmental monitoring show that low levels of oil sands development-related contaminants are present in both air and water. In almost all water and air samples, levels of oil sands development-related contaminants are below relevant environmental guidelines, and levels decrease with increasing distance from oil sands development. Overall, the levels of contaminants in water and in air are not a cause for concern.”

Scientists and activists have consistently identified the Alberta and federal governments’ tendency toward framing facts in misleading terms.

“Anyone with any common sense knows you can't take two years of good monitoring and forecast to find out what changes there have been in the environment,” Schindler recently said of Premier Alison Redford’s attempts to advertise her province’s environmental record during a trip to Washington.

Although there is no direct author cited in the analysis sections, the portal assures that, “data being released has been subject to quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures, and the information has been approved by the Assistant Deputy Minister of Science and Technology, Environment Canada and the Assistant Deputy Minister of Science and Monitoring, Alberta Environment and Water.”

Like a kid in a candy store
When those boxes of heavily redacted documents start to pile in, reporters at The Narwhal waste no time in looking for kernels of news that matter the most. Just ask our Prairies reporter Drew Anderson, who gleefully scanned through freedom of information files like a kid in a candy store, leading to pretty damning revelations in Alberta. Long story short: the government wasn’t being forthright when it claimed its pause on new renewable energy projects wasn’t political. Just like that, our small team was again leading the charge on a pretty big story

In an oil-rich province like Alberta, that kind of reporting is crucial. But look at our investigative work on TC Energy’s Coastal GasLink pipeline to the west, or our Greenbelt reporting out in Ontario. They all highlight one thing: those with power over our shared natural world don’t want you to know how — or why — they call the shots. And we try to disrupt that.

Our journalism is powered by people just like you. We never take corporate ad dollars, or put this public-interest information behind a paywall. Will you join the pod of Narwhals that make a difference by helping us uncover some of the most important stories of our time?
Like a kid in a candy store
When those boxes of heavily redacted documents start to pile in, reporters at The Narwhal waste no time in looking for kernels of news that matter the most. Just ask our Prairies reporter Drew Anderson, who gleefully scanned through freedom of information files like a kid in a candy store, leading to pretty damning revelations in Alberta. Long story short: the government wasn’t being forthright when it claimed its pause on new renewable energy projects wasn’t political. Just like that, our small team was again leading the charge on a pretty big story

In an oil-rich province like Alberta, that kind of reporting is crucial. But look at our investigative work on TC Energy’s Coastal GasLink pipeline to the west, or our Greenbelt reporting out in Ontario. They all highlight one thing: those with power over our shared natural world don’t want you to know how — or why — they call the shots. And we try to disrupt that.

Our journalism is powered by people just like you. We never take corporate ad dollars, or put this public-interest information behind a paywall. Will you join the pod of Narwhals that make a difference by helping us uncover some of the most important stories of our time?

Manitobans rally to oppose proposed new peat mining project

Get the inside scoop on The Narwhal’s environment and climate reporting by signing up for our free newsletter. Residents and cottagers on the shores of Lake...

Continue reading

Recent Posts

Our newsletter subscribers are the first to find out when we break a big story. Sign up for free →
An illustration, in yellow, of a computer, with an open envelope inside it with letter reading 'Breaking news.'
Your access to our journalism is free — always. Sign up for our weekly newsletter for investigative reporting on the natural world in Canada you won’t find anywhere else.
'This is not a paywall' text illustration, in a reddish-pink font colour
Your access to our journalism is free — always. Sign up for our weekly newsletter for investigative reporting on the natural world in Canada you won’t find anywhere else.
'This is not a paywall' text illustration, in a reddish-pink font colour