Generous bonuses for mine managers, rewarding them for cutting costs or increasing production, are linked to tailings dam failures, a new research paper has found.
The paper, published in the journal Resources Policy, pulled on a previous 2015 study that found a relationship between dam collapses and ramped up production or cost-cutting measures and carried the idea to the next level by looking at bonus schemes.
The new study, which documents four catastrophic collapses, including the failure of the Mount Polley tailings dam in B.C. in August 2014, found that all four companies had increased production or reduced operating costs prior to tailings dam failures.
Imperial Metals ramped up production before dam collapse
Imperial Metals, which owns the Mount Polley copper and gold mine, increased production by 23 per cent in the second quarter of the year over the previous financial quarter.
The first quarterly report for Imperial Metals in 2014 showed average daily production was 18,791 tonnes, which was lower than usual because of snowfall and mechanical issues, while the second quarterly report shows production increased by 23 per cent to 23,930 tonnes a day “significantly over the budgeted throughput rate.”
Imperial Metals, in common with many mining companies, did not disclose incentives offered to middle managers, but two companies out of the four case studies showed hefty bonus schemes for managers and the practice is believed to be widespread in the mining industry.
“We believe that the bonus system used to recompense middle management encourages managers to take more risks in order to generate short-term profits at the risk of serious long-term accidents,” said the paper, authored by Margaret Armstrong, Renato Petterd and Carlos Pettard.
“Year after year, managers keep taking risks with a low probability of occurrence, but with potentially catastrophic consequences. These risks are compounded by shortages of experienced staff, due to the cyclical nature of the industry and the retirement of the baby-boomer generation,” it says.
Armstrong, in an emailed response to questions from The Narwhal, said the 2015 study proved there was a statistical link between higher production and serious tailings dam failures.
“We therefore believe that this factor influenced the Mount Polley failures,” she said.
Tailings dam failures increasing
The number of tailings dam failures worldwide has doubled in the past 20 years from eight between 1999 and 2003, to 16 between 2014 and 2018. In addition to the push to reduce costs and increase production, increased amounts of waste from mines is also factoring into the increase in accidents, the study says.
“Advances in mining technology have made it possible to exploit lower grade deposits, despite decreasing commodity prices, which means disposing of more rejects and putting more pressure on tailings facilities,” the report says.
“Pressure on mines to increase production and cut costs may be the underlying causes of many of the tailings dam failures, even if the immediate causes are excessive rainfall, poor management practices or poorly understood geotechnical characteristics.”
The Mount Polley dam collapse sent 25 million litres of contaminated sludge and water into Polley Lake, Hazeltine Creek and Quesnel Lake, a source of drinking water and major spawning grounds for sockeye salmon.
However, the paper notes that the company has not paid for the full cost of the clean up. Also, the three-year deadline to lay charges under B.C. law has passed and the five-year window to lay charges under federal laws is almost up.
“The industry’s image has been tarnished by the tragic dam failures in Brazil and by companies such as Boliden and Imperial Metals that have avoided paying for part or all of their tailings dam accidents by discharging the responsibility on to those who designed, built and maintained their tailings dam facility,” the paper concludes.
“The mining industry as a whole must find ways to reduce the number of tailings dam failures and to prevent companies from opting out of their responsibilities to society, even if they have done it in a perfectly legal way, because the long-term future of the industry requires acceptance of mining by stakeholders and by society as a whole,” it says.
Researchers encourage shift to dry stack tailings
Recommendations by the researchers include changing to dry stack tailings or, at the least, reducing the quantity of water in the waste.
Armstrong told The Narwhal that scientific research has shown that the drier the waste coming out of the processing, the lower the risk of tailings dam failure.
“Another advantage of drier rejects is that they take up less space. This reduces their ecological footprint,” she said.
Governments should also impose much heavier fines and penalties, she said.
‘They try to cut costs to survive’
Ugo Lapointe of MiningWatch Canada agrees serious fines and penalties are needed to discourage financially unstable companies from taking risks with public and environmental safety and said the paper underlines that economic factors are often behind dam failures.
Companies sometimes crank production to take advantage of a high commodity bubble, which means they push the limit of the system and structures, but others are doing whatever they can to survive financially — and that means problems, Laspointe said.
“There are too many economically marginal mines that are being permitted. Mines that are struggling financially are the riskiest because they don’t have much buffer to operate so they try to cut costs to survive and cutting costs may mean cutting safety corners and then they also crank up production,” he said.
Previous studies have said that between 30 and 40 per cent of mines worldwide are economically marginal and should not be permitted, Lapointe said.
“We have been singing that tune for several years when we meet government and regulators and we are hoping it is starting to percolate in the right circles,” he said.
Governments need to firm up legislation so they are able to deny permits on an economic basis, something which is currently a grey area, Lapointe said.
“Environmental assessment laws are not clear on financial risks being a risk for the environment, but they should be,” he said.
‘Who is accountable?’
The researchers praised the Mining Association of Canada (MAC) guidelines, revised after the Mount Polley disaster, which, among other provisions, requires an engineer to verify the design and safety of tailings dams and for companies to include the effects of climate change when looking at designs and risk management.
“They should lead to improvements in tailings dam management, but they are just guidelines,” Armstrong said.
However, the guidelines may make other industries and governments look seriously at risks posed by mining operations.
“I think that insurance companies will put pressure on mining companies to respect the MAC guidelines if they want insurance,” Armstrong said.
The Mining Association of Canada guidelines are a good starting point, but fall short because they do not include specific technical criteria for the design and construction of dams and do not specify that a company’s economic risks should be assessed as part of the safety process, said Lapointe, whose organization has been pushing for sureties and bonds to cover the actual costs of reclamation or accidents.
“And the guidelines do not address consequences and sanctions. What happens if the dams fail and who is accountable?” he said, pointing out there are only 45 days remaining for the federal government to lay charges over the Mount Polley disaster.
Imperial Metals did not respond to requests for an interview.
And since you’re here, we have a favour to ask. Our independent, ad-free journalism is made possible because the people who value our work also support it (did we mention our stories are free for all to read, not just those who can afford to pay?).
As a non-profit, reader-funded news organization, our goal isn’t to sell advertising or to please corporate bigwigs — it’s to bring evidence-based news and analysis to the surface for all Canadians. And at a time when most news organizations have been laying off reporters, we’ve hired eight journalists over the past year.
Not only are we filling a void in environment coverage, but we’re also telling stories differently — by centring Indigenous voices, by building community and by doing it all as a people-powered, non-profit outlet supported by more than 2,500 members.
The truth is we wouldn’t be here without you. Every single one of you who reads and shares our articles is a crucial part of building a new model for Canadian journalism that puts people before profit.
We know that these days the world’s problems can feel a *touch* overwhelming. It’s easy to feel like what we do doesn’t make any difference, but becoming a member of The Narwhal is one small way you truly can make a difference.
We’ve drafted a plan to make 2021 our biggest year yet, but we need your support to make it all happen.
If you believe news organizations should report to their readers, not advertisers or shareholders, please become a monthly member of The Narwhal today for any amount you can afford.