Taming the Wolves of Wall Street: Brett Scott on Democratizing the Finance Sector

After years of economic crisis and the rise of social movements like Occupy Wall Street, the idea that there is something rotten in the financial sector has become commonplace. Banks that were too big to fail before the bailouts are bigger than ever, and investment in oilsands expansion, fracking, arctic oil exploration and deep-sea drilling continues at an alarming pace.

Financial activist Brett Scott describes the situation succinctly: “The financial sector right now is crap at social justice and crap at ecological sustainability.” But Scott believes there’s another crucial point that often gets overlooked in critiques of the financial system.

"Even if the financial sector was socially just and sustainable, there is still the sense that we actually have no democratic access to it," says Scott. "Politicians always seem fixated about how to make the sector into a more benign dictatorship, rather than focusing on how to increase people's sense of personal participation in it."

Reducing the sense of personal alienation that people feel in relation to the financial system was one of the goals that motivated Scott to write The Heretic’s Guide to Global Finance, published last year by Pluto Press. The book explains the basic functioning of financial markets in language that’s easy to understand, and provides ideas to contest the power of big money in determining the shape of our collective future. Since the continued growth of the fossil fuel industry relies heavily on investment from major financial institutions, Scott’s work provides a much-needed critical counterpoint to the system.   

Compared to the popular portrayals of stockbroker decadence in films like The Wolf of Wall Street, Scott’s book doesn’t rely on a story of bad behavior to explain why the financial system produces such spectacularly negative effects. Speaking as someone who has worked in the financial sector, Scott insists that most traders bear little resemblance to exaggerated cinematic villains like Gordon Gekko. When it comes to character or moral bearing, “there’s nothing fundamentally different between the people in the financial sector and those in the rest of the world,” Scott says.

For Scott, both moral judgment and technical discussions about how the financial system could be better regulated are less important than figuring out how to make finance more democratic.

“I’m not actually that interested in the big battles over the regulatory stuff, or how good or evil some particular CEO is,” he says. “I’m more interested in the power dynamic between the person on the ground and the financial sector.”

It was the unequal power dynamic between financial insiders and outsiders that motivated Scott to find out firsthand what makes the world of finance tick. Hailing from a background in activism and NGO work in South Africa, Scott had grown frustrated with the fact that he was fluent in macro-level critiques of the financial system, but still didn’t really understand the details of how money gets invested in concrete projects like mines and oil and gas operations.

Intent on figuring out the game from the inside, Scott moved to London in 2008 to join a start-up derivatives brokerage firm, where he spent two years learning the ropes of high finance. While he was on the phone persuading clients to buy derivatives, Scott was also doing a kind of activist research, learning how different financial products work and studying the relationships between financial professionals.

One of the key take-home points from his anthropological foray inside the financial sector is that investment decisions are not just about business, but are always inherently political. “One thing I always try to get across to activists is that fund managers are making political decisions with their money,” says Scott. “You’re deploying resources that you could deploy somewhere else, in a way that benefits some people and not others, and that’s incredibly political.”

Decisions about where to invest are ultimately decisions about what kind of a world we want to live in. If the financial system functioned under democratic oversight, putting money into projects like building desperately needed renewable energy infrastructure would be a no-brainer.

But as it stands, investment decisions are made by a small moneyed aristocracy of bankers and their corporate and political allies—which is why money continues to flow into profitable but destructive dirty energy.  

As Scott sees it, the undemocratic power concentrated in the financial sector is reinforced through the vocabulary of economic rationality that shapes our everyday lives. “The pseudo-scientific language of the financial sector is one way that people distance themselves from thinking about the underlying exploitation,” Scott explains.

We’ve become so accustomed to hearing endless reports about economic growth, yield spreads and returns on equity that it’s easy to lose sight of the human and ecological reality underneath the jargon.

A useful strategy for waking ourselves up to the social relationships that actually constitute economic activity is to denaturalize the language we use. Instead of talking about money, Scott refers to “COGAS”: claims on goods and services. It’s a simple linguistic move, but one that can help to break the spell of finance and get us thinking about the fact that money is ultimately just a socially-constructed medium of exchange, not some magic totem with unquestionable power over our lives.

Scott views strategies such as the oilsands divestment campaign in much the same way. Rather than use divestment as a tool to actually starve companies working in oil and gas extraction of operating funds, Scott sees the campaign as a means of changing the cultural consensus around fossil fuels.

“That to me is a really key thing about divestment, is how do you start to make it increasingly socially unacceptable to assume that it’s normal to invest in destructive projects. I don’t think the divestment projects in themselves are going to stop it, but they challenge the notion that something is normal,” he says.

Both in his book and on his blog Suit Possom, Scott’s writing is full of ideas for how to challenge the daunting authority of the financial sector, and experiments that could help to create better systems of sharing, exchange and investment that can go beyond the logic of profit. Somewhere between radical activist and entrepreneur, Scott is informed by what he describes as a “hacker ethos.”

“A hacker approach involves exploring a system and developing an acute sense of how you’re connected into it,” Scott says. Whether you’re into cryptocurrencies like BitCoin or disruptive forms of shareholder activism, The Heretic’s Guide to Global Finance offers some solid tools for taking control of the financial system.

You can find more of Brett Scott’s writings on financial activism and alternative economics on his blog, including plans for a London School of Financial Activism, due to launch this year.

David Ravensbergen’s writing has appeared in Discorder, The Tyee, the Montreal Review of Books and the Montreal Mirror. Originally from…

Meet the people saving Canada’s native grasslands

This is the third part of Carbon Cache, an ongoing series about nature-based climate solutions. It’s home to bears, elk, coyotes and birds, as well...

Continue reading

Recent Posts