START – Apple News Only Block
Add content to the Apple News only block. You can add things like headings, paragraphs, images, galleries and audio clips. The content added here will not be visable on the website article

Get the inside scoop on The Narwhal’s environment and climate reporting by signing up for our free newsletter.

END – Apple News Only Block

Around the world, governments, researchers and companies are scrambling to reduce the sheer volume of carbon pollution created by modern life. Among the ideas gaining traction in Canada is carbon capture — collecting carbon dioxide before it is sent up into the atmosphere. 

The Pathways Alliance group of oil giants want to do just that, collecting carbon pollution from the Alberta oilsands and shipping it approximately 400 kilometres by pipeline to an underground storage site just outside St. Paul, Alta., where it will be injected deep underground — forever.

Map showing general route of Pathways alliance proposed carbon pipeline through northern Alberta
If approved, a 400-kilometre pipeline — at places approximately a metre wide — would carry carbon dioxide from the oilsands to be buried under rural Alberta. Map: Shawn Parkinson / The Narwhal

Though the plan is anything but final, Pathways, whose six members control 95 per cent of oilsands production, did put in its first application for regulatory approval earlier this year and has said it has invested heavily in its plans. 

But the proposal doesn’t sit well with everyone along the pipeline route and the Alberta Energy Regulator recently confirmed the province will not be requiring the project undergo an environmental assessment.

Here’s what you need to know about some very tangible risks Albertans on the ground are talking about as a carbon pipeline might move in next door.

1. How likely is an explosion — and who would respond in an emergency?

Carbon dioxide pipelines are not new — they crisscross North America (mostly for use in extracting more oil from the ground, rather than permanent storage).

pathways alliance: Seven horses graze in a field on a cloudy grey day
The proposed Pathways Alliance pipeline could pass within a kilometre of the town of St. Paul, leaving residents wondering what would happen in the event of an explosion — and who would respond in an emergency. Photo: Amber Bracken / The Narwhal

Any major project comes with risks. In 2020, a carbon dioxide pipeline ruptured in Mississippi, showing just how serious those risks can be. Within minutes, there were reports of people having seizures or falling unconscious. At least 45 people were hospitalized. The county’s emergency director likened it to “the zombie apocalypse.”

According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “there is no indication that problems for carbon dioxide pipelines are any more challenging than those set by hydrocarbon pipelines.” That said, they may be more subject to what are known as “longitudinal running fractures” — a rapid and catastrophic unzipping, or splitting, of a pipeline — than other gas pipelines.

This leads to many questions for Albertans near the proposed Pathways Alliance carbon pipeline route, including about emergency response vehicles, which have oxygen-dependent engines that can fail if carbon dioxide leaks.

We’re covering energy on the Prairies
The Narwhal’s Prairies bureau is here to bring you stories on energy and the environment you won’t find anywhere else. Stay tapped in by signing up for a weekly dose of our ad‑free, independent journalism.
The Narwhal’s Prairies bureau is here to bring you stories on energy and the environment you won’t find anywhere else. Stay tapped in by signing up for a weekly dose of our ad‑free, independent journalism.
We’re covering energy on the Prairies

A spokesperson for the Alberta Energy Regulator, which is responsible for evaluating the Pathways Alliance application, said by email that any carbon dioxide pipeline licensed by the regulator is required to have a corporate emergency response plan.

2. How might a leak affect the groundwater?

Albertans alongside the proposed path of the carbon pollution pipeline worry about how a potential leak could impact groundwater, citing similar concerns across the globe.

In Australia, the Queensland government announced it would prevent the storage of carbon pollution under a 1.7-million-square-kilometre area of the state. An environmental assessment found carbon storage would “likely cause an irreversible or long-term change in water quality” if carbon pollution were to migrate through the region’s aquifer, spreading contaminants such as lead and arsenic.

pathways alliance: A hose hangs on a fence in front of a garden with raised beds on a grey day
“Water is number one,” one concerned resident says, questioning how Pathways Alliance can ensure the long-term protection of groundwater when carbon dioxide is injected deep into the ground. Photo: Amber Bracken / The Narwhal

The Alberta Energy Regulator said ensuring carbon dioxide doesn’t migrate into groundwater is a “critical focus area” and that it requires companies “to review the area geology to ensure a high level of confidence.”

3. Will Treaty Rights be impacted?

Several First Nations in the region, including Heart Lake First Nation, Beaver Lake Cree Nation, Whitefish Lake First Nation, Kehewin Cree Nation, Frog Lake First Nation, Cold Lake First Nations and Onion Lake Cree Nation, have been asking questions about the project. Some have expressed concern about their abilities to exercise their Treaty Rights.

“We don’t know how pumping carbon underground will affect our lakes, our rivers — even our underground reservoirs,” Michael Lameman, a councillor at Beaver Lake Cree Nation, told CBC earlier this year. 

pathways alliance: An aerial view of steaming oilsands being moved by a bulldozer
The Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation has long been vocal about the impacts of the Alberta oilsands on the community. Now, the nation is worried about how an industry plan to capture carbon dioxide could potentially impact its Treaty Rights, and says Pathways Alliance has not provided enough information to date. Photo: Amber Bracken / The Narwhal

Pathways Alliance has not provided enough information about specifics, according to Moronkeji (Kg) Banjoko, who works in the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation’s Department of Dene Lands and Resource Management. 

“There is no information about what the project will do — as a whole and cumulatively with other industrial development in the area — to the environment, local communities and [Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation’s] Treaty Rights,” Banjoko wrote in an email.

4. Does underground storage of carbon pollution actually work?

Nearly 50,000 megatonnes of carbon pollution are emitted globally each year. The Pathways Alliance plan for the $16-billion project aims to bury 10 to 12 megatonnes of carbon dioxide deep underground each year — roughly equivalent to the carbon pollution emitted by the oilsands every six weeks.

Pathways says it wants to “produce some of the cleanest barrels of oil in the world” and that carbon capture is “safe, proven and reliable.”

pathways alliance: Emissions coming from oilsands operations in Fort McMurray, Alta.
Researchers say the Pathways Alliance has not made the full cost of its plan clear, or how much public funding is necessary to complete it. Photo: Amber Bracken / The Narwhal

But experts like David Schlissel at the U.S.-based Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis are concerned carbon capture is more “hype” than evidence.

“There’s no evidence that it will capture 90 to 95 per cent of the carbon dioxide it’s designed to capture,” Schlissel says, referring to an oft-cited industry standard for carbon capture rates — a baseline target that acknowledges the amount of carbon pollution that needs to be be captured to be worth the investment. Schlissel notes data shows real-world carbon capture rates range from 10 to 78 per cent. 

Others say the technology is an attempt at gaining “social licence” for continued production of fossil fuels — the U. S. House of Representatives’ central investigative committee is one such critic, saying the promise of a tech fix relieves pressure to pivot to energy sources that produce less carbon pollution. 

5. Is Pathways Alliance doing enough to inform and listen to affected communities?

“They were in Dubai, they were in Calgary and Texas and they’re all over the world,” one Alberta landowner says of the places Pathways Alliance representatives have publicly extolled the virtues of their carbon capture plan. But, she says, “They’ve spent about three hours here.”

Some residents along the proposed pipeline route feel shut out of the process, noting that landowners whose properties are directly affected might have a say, but the rest of the community does not. 

More than anything, they say, they want Pathways Alliance to answer their questions about the risks. (Pathways Alliance did not respond to multiple requests for an interview, nor a detailed list of questions about the project.)

Like a kid in a candy store
When those boxes of heavily redacted documents start to pile in, reporters at The Narwhal waste no time in looking for kernels of news that matter the most. Just ask our Prairies reporter Drew Anderson, who gleefully scanned through freedom of information files like a kid in a candy store, leading to pretty damning revelations in Alberta. Long story short: the government wasn’t being forthright when it claimed its pause on new renewable energy projects wasn’t political. Just like that, our small team was again leading the charge on a pretty big story

In an oil-rich province like Alberta, that kind of reporting is crucial. But look at our investigative work on TC Energy’s Coastal GasLink pipeline to the west, or our Greenbelt reporting out in Ontario. They all highlight one thing: those with power over our shared natural world don’t want you to know how — or why — they call the shots. And we try to disrupt that.

Our journalism is powered by people just like you. We never take corporate ad dollars, or put this public-interest information behind a paywall. Will you join the pod of Narwhals that make a difference by helping us uncover some of the most important stories of our time?
Like a kid in a candy store
When those boxes of heavily redacted documents start to pile in, reporters at The Narwhal waste no time in looking for kernels of news that matter the most. Just ask our Prairies reporter Drew Anderson, who gleefully scanned through freedom of information files like a kid in a candy store, leading to pretty damning revelations in Alberta. Long story short: the government wasn’t being forthright when it claimed its pause on new renewable energy projects wasn’t political. Just like that, our small team was again leading the charge on a pretty big story

In an oil-rich province like Alberta, that kind of reporting is crucial. But look at our investigative work on TC Energy’s Coastal GasLink pipeline to the west, or our Greenbelt reporting out in Ontario. They all highlight one thing: those with power over our shared natural world don’t want you to know how — or why — they call the shots. And we try to disrupt that.

Our journalism is powered by people just like you. We never take corporate ad dollars, or put this public-interest information behind a paywall. Will you join the pod of Narwhals that make a difference by helping us uncover some of the most important stories of our time?

Recent Posts

Our newsletter subscribers are the first to find out when we break a big story. Sign up for free →
An illustration, in yellow, of a computer, with an open envelope inside it with letter reading 'Breaking news.'
Your access to our journalism is free — always. Sign up for our weekly newsletter for investigative reporting on the natural world in Canada you won’t find anywhere else.
'This is not a paywall' text illustration, in a reddish-pink font colour
Your access to our journalism is free — always. Sign up for our weekly newsletter for investigative reporting on the natural world in Canada you won’t find anywhere else.
'This is not a paywall' text illustration, in a reddish-pink font colour